Annemarie E. Engström

2.7k total citations · 1 hit paper
38 papers, 1.7k citations indexed

About

Annemarie E. Engström is a scholar working on Biomedical Engineering, Surgery and Emergency Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Annemarie E. Engström has authored 38 papers receiving a total of 1.7k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 31 papers in Biomedical Engineering, 30 papers in Surgery and 19 papers in Emergency Medicine. Recurrent topics in Annemarie E. Engström's work include Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices (30 papers), Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair (24 papers) and Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (19 papers). Annemarie E. Engström is often cited by papers focused on Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices (30 papers), Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair (24 papers) and Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (19 papers). Annemarie E. Engström collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, Germany and Switzerland. Annemarie E. Engström's co-authors include José P.S. Henriques, Krischan D. Sjauw, Wim K. Lagrand, Marije M. Vis, Dagmar M. Ouweneel, Antoine H.G. Driessen, Jan J. Piek, Bas A.J.M. de Mol, Robbert J. de Winter and Thomas G. V. Cherpanath and has published in prestigious journals such as Circulation, Journal of the American College of Cardiology and PLoS ONE.

In The Last Decade

Annemarie E. Engström

35 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Extracorporeal life support during cardiac arrest and cardiogenic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2016 310 citations Dagmar M. Ouweneel, Krischan D. Sjauw et al. profile →

Peers

Annemarie E. Engström

SURGE

CCM

RNMI

Krischan D. Sjauw Netherlands

David Wohns United States

L. Truby United States

V. Vivian Dimas United States

Mustafa Özbaran Türkiye

Athanasios Tsiouris United States

Marc T. Swartz United States

Hsiu‐Yu Fang Taiwan

Thomas A. Vassiliades United States

Ramesh Singh United States

Krischan D. Sjauw Netherlands

Annemarie E. Engström

2.2k ×1.7

SURGE

2.0k ×1.7

1.3k ×1.6

1.4k ×1.9

CCM

464 ×2.2

RNMI

Citations per year, relative to Annemarie E. Engström Annemarie E. Engström (= 1×) peers Krischan D. Sjauw

Countries citing papers authored by Annemarie E. Engström

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Annemarie E. Engström's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Annemarie E. Engström with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Annemarie E. Engström more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Annemarie E. Engström

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Annemarie E. Engström. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Annemarie E. Engström. The network helps show where Annemarie E. Engström may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Annemarie E. Engström

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Annemarie E. Engström. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Annemarie E. Engström based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Annemarie E. Engström. Annemarie E. Engström is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Bogerd, Margriet, Annemarie E. Engström, Arjan Malekzadeh, et al.. (2025). Resource utilization associated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation vs. microaxial flow pump for infarct-related cardiogenic shock. European Heart Journal Acute Cardiovascular Care. 14(5). 279–287. 1 indexed citations

Bogerd, Margriet, Annemarie E. Engström, Wim K. Lagrand, et al.. (2024). Sex disparities in myocardial infarction related cardiogenic shock. International Journal of Cardiology. 420. 132730–132730.

Bogerd, Margriet, Alexander P. J. Vlaar, Annemarie E. Engström, et al.. (2023). Impella and Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction. European Journal of Heart Failure. 25(11). 2021–2031. 21 indexed citations

Wernly, Bernhard, Mina Karami, Annemarie E. Engström, et al.. (2021). Impella versus Extracorporal Life Support in Cardiogenic Shock: A Propensity Score Adjusted Analysis. ESC Heart Failure. 8(2). 953–961. 11 indexed citations

Karami, Mina, Krischan D. Sjauw, Annemarie E. Engström, et al.. (2020). Pre-PCI versus immediate post-PCI Impella initiation in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. PLoS ONE. 15(7). e0235762–e0235762. 13 indexed citations

Karami, Mina, Corstiaan A. den Uil, Dagmar M. Ouweneel, et al.. (2019). Mechanical circulatory support in cardiogenic shock from acute myocardial infarction: Impella CP/5.0 versus ECMO. European Heart Journal Acute Cardiovascular Care. 9(2). 164–172. 68 indexed citations

Uil, Corstiaan A. den, Nicolas M. Van Mieghem, Marcelo B. Bastos, et al.. (2019). Primary intra-aortic balloon support versus inotropes for decompensated heart failure and low output: a randomised trial. EuroIntervention. 15(7). 586–593. 33 indexed citations

Ouweneel, Dagmar M., Justin de Brabander, Mina Karami, et al.. (2018). Real-life use of left ventricular circulatory support with Impella in cardiogenic shock after acute myocardial infarction: 12 years AMC experience. European Heart Journal Acute Cardiovascular Care. 8(4). 338–349. 57 indexed citations

Bergh, Walter M. van den, et al.. (2015). Thromboembolic stroke in patients with a HeartMate-II left ventricular assist device – the role of anticoagulation. Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery. 10(1). 128–128. 10 indexed citations

10.

Sjauw, Krischan D., Annemarie E. Engström, Marije M. Vis, et al.. (2012). Efficacy and timing of intra-aortic counterpulsation in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. Netherlands Heart Journal. 20(10). 402–409. 20 indexed citations

11.

Engström, Annemarie E., Krischan D. Sjauw, Jan Baan, et al.. (2011). Long-term safety and sustained left ventricular recovery: long-term results of percutaneous left ventricular support with Impella LP2.5 in ST-elevation myocardial infarction. EuroIntervention. 6(7). 860–865. 20 indexed citations

12.

Engström, Annemarie E., Ricardo Cocchieri, Antoine H.G. Driessen, et al.. (2011). The Impella 2.5 and 5.0 devices for ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients presenting with severe and profound cardiogenic shock: The Academic Medical Center intensive care unit experience*. Critical Care Medicine. 39(9). 2072–2079. 90 indexed citations

13.

Engström, Annemarie E., Marije M. Vis, Berto J. Bouma, et al.. (2010). Right Ventricular Dysfunction is an Independent Predictor for Mortality in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients Presenting with Cardiogenic Shock on Admission. European Journal of Heart Failure. 12(3). 276–282. 56 indexed citations

14.

Vis, Marije M., Annemarie E. Engström, Krischan D. Sjauw, et al.. (2010). Plasma glucose and not hemoglobin or renal function predicts mortality in patients with STEMI complicated with cardiogenic shock. Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine. 11(11). 827–831. 5 indexed citations

15.

Schaaf, René J. van der, Bimmer E. Claessen, Marije M. Vis, et al.. (2010). Effect of Multivessel Coronary Disease With or Without Concurrent Chronic Total Occlusion on One-Year Mortality in Patients Treated With Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Cardiogenic Shock. The American Journal of Cardiology. 105(7). 955–959. 81 indexed citations

16.

Sjauw, Krischan D., Annemarie E. Engström, René J. van der Schaaf, et al.. (2010). The influence of gender on short- and long-term outcome after primary PCI and delivered medical care for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. EuroIntervention. 5(7). 780–787. 32 indexed citations

17.

Engström, Annemarie E., Jan J. Piek, & José P.S. Henriques. (2010). Percutaneous left ventricular assist devices for high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention. Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy. 8(9). 1247–1255. 3 indexed citations

18.

Sjauw, Krischan D., Thomas Konorza, Raimund Erbel, et al.. (2009). Supported High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With the Impella 2.5 Device. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 54(25). 2430–2434. 177 indexed citations

19.

Claessen, Bimmer E., René J. van der Schaaf, Niels Verouden, et al.. (2009). Evaluation of the Effect of a Concurrent Chronic Total Occlusion on Long-Term Mortality and Left Ventricular Function in Patients After Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions. 2(11). 1128–1134. 164 indexed citations

20.

Sjauw, Krischan D., Annemarie E. Engström, & José P.S. Henriques. (2007). Percutaneous mechanical cardiac assist in myocardial infarction. Where are we now, where are we going?. Acute Cardiac Care. 9(4). 222–230. 18 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact