Jamie M. King

6.8k total citations · 1 hit paper
7 papers, 5.2k citations indexed

About

Jamie M. King is a scholar working on Social Psychology, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences and Clinical Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Jamie M. King has authored 7 papers receiving a total of 5.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 2 papers in Social Psychology, 2 papers in General Agricultural and Biological Sciences and 1 paper in Clinical Psychology. Recurrent topics in Jamie M. King's work include Diverse Educational Innovations Studies (2 papers), Education Discipline and Inequality (1 paper) and Sport and Mega-Event Impacts (1 paper). Jamie M. King is often cited by papers focused on Diverse Educational Innovations Studies (2 papers), Education Discipline and Inequality (1 paper) and Sport and Mega-Event Impacts (1 paper). Jamie M. King collaborates with scholars based in United States, Portugal and Belize. Jamie M. King's co-authors include James B. Schreiber, Amaury Nora, Frances K. Stage, Elizabeth A. Barlow, Laura M. Crothers, Ara J. Schmitt, John Lipinski, G.M. Pesti, Rashid Zaman and Mark Agius and has published in prestigious journals such as Poultry Science, The Journal of Educational Research and Journal of Applied School Psychology.

In The Last Decade

Jamie M. King

7 papers receiving 4.9k citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Reporting Structural Equation Modeling and Confirmatory Factor Analysis Results: A Review

2006 5.1k citations James B. Schreiber, Amaury Nora et al. The Journal of Educational Research profile →

Peers

Jamie M. King

SP

CP

SPS

EDUCA

ECP

Elizabeth A. Barlow United States

Tiffany A. Whittaker United States

Sehee Hong South Korea

Robin K. Henson United States

John W. Lounsbury United States

Moon‐Ho Ringo Ho Singapore

Paul A. Gore United States

Cora J. M. Maas Netherlands

James B. Schreiber United States

Murray Smith United Kingdom

Elizabeth A. Barlow United States

Jamie M. King

1.2k ×1.0

SP

1.1k ×1.0

CP

1.1k ×1.0

SPS

929 ×1.0

EDUCA

596 ×1.0

ECP

Citations per year, relative to Jamie M. King Jamie M. King (= 1×) peers Elizabeth A. Barlow

Countries citing papers authored by Jamie M. King

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jamie M. King's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jamie M. King with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jamie M. King more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jamie M. King

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jamie M. King. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jamie M. King. The network helps show where Jamie M. King may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jamie M. King

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jamie M. King. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jamie M. King based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jamie M. King. Jamie M. King is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

7 of 7 papers shown

1.

King, Jamie M., et al.. (2021). Behind a success story: How the NFL used digital marketing to grow a mainstream sports audience in the UK. Journal of digital & social media marketing.. 9(2). 127–127. 1 indexed citations

2.

King, Jamie M., Mark Agius, & Rashid Zaman. (2012). The Kraepelinian dichotomy in terms of suicidal behaviour.. PubMed. 24 Suppl 1. S117–8. 1 indexed citations

3.

Crothers, Laura M., et al.. (2010). A Preliminary Study of Bully and Victim Behavior in Old-for-Grade Students: Another Potential Hidden Cost of Grade Retention or Delayed School Entry. Journal of Applied School Psychology. 26(4). 327–338. 26 indexed citations

4.

King, Jamie M., et al.. (2006). Newspaper Coverage of the Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy Outbreak in the United States: A Content Analysis. Journal of Applied Communications. 90(3). 13 indexed citations

5.

Schreiber, James B., Amaury Nora, Frances K. Stage, Elizabeth A. Barlow, & Jamie M. King. (2006). Reporting Structural Equation Modeling and Confirmatory Factor Analysis Results: A Review. The Journal of Educational Research. 99(6). 323–338. 5107 indexed citations breakdown →

6.

Pesti, G.M., et al.. (2000). The use of instructional technology in poultry science curricula in the United States and Canada: 1. Demographics of technology and software use. Poultry Science. 79(4). 493–505. 1 indexed citations

7.

Pesti, G.M., et al.. (2000). The use of instructional technology in poultry science curricula in the United States and Canada: 2. Factors contributing to the use of instructional technology. Poultry Science. 79(4). 506–513. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact