Jamie Grace

22 papers receiving 153 citations

Peers

Jamie Grace
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
  • Safety Research 57
  • Health Informatics 5
  • Health 21
  • Sociology and Political Science 85
  • Political Science and International Relations 42
Replace Carolyn McKay with:
Carolyn McKay Australia
Petra Molnar Canada
Kiran Vinod Bhatia United States
Damian Clifford Australia
Doris Allhutter Austria
Jisoo Hwang South Korea
Luisa Marin Italy
Lance Y. Hunter United States
Jana Arsovska United States
Jamie Grace relative to Carolyn McKay Australia Carolyn McKay's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Carolyn McKay · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jamie Grace

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jamie Grace's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jamie Grace with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jamie Grace more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jamie Grace

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jamie Grace. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jamie Grace. The network helps show where Jamie Grace may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside Jamie Grace, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jamie Grace Line = papers co-authored together Jamie Grace links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2018103
2 20208
3 20137
4 20156
5 20215
6 20134
7 20194
8 20203
9 20153
10
Assessing vulnerabilities in the Domestic Violence Disclosure Scheme
20183
11 20143
12 20172
13 20142
14 20202
15 20162
16
A balance of rights and protections in public order policing: A case study on Rotherham
20181
17 20121
18
Norman Stanley Fletcher and the case of the proprietary algorithmic risk assessment.
20161
19 20201
20 20151

About Jamie Grace

Jamie Grace is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, Law, Health and Safety Research, having authored 35 papers that have together received 164 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include European Criminal Justice and Data Protection (8 papers), Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (7 papers), Criminal Law and Evidence (6 papers), Intimate Partner and Family Violence (6 papers), Sex work and related issues (5 papers), Ethics and Social Impacts of AI (5 papers), Policing Practices and Perceptions (4 papers) and Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Safety Research (57 citations), Health Informatics (5 citations), Health (21 citations), Sociology and Political Science (85 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (42 citations). Jamie Grace has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, India and United States. Frequent co-authors include Marion Oswald, Geoffrey C. Barnes, Vasna Joshua, Camilla Kilbane, Leslie C. Markun, Graham A. Glass, Jill L. Ostrem and Nicholas B. Galifianakis. Their work appears in journals such as Information & Communications Technology Law, The Police Journal Theory Practice and Principles, Policing & Society, International journal of law, crime and justice and The Political Quarterly.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact