James W. Smith

791 citations
16 papers · 584 indexed · 1 hit paper · h-index 8

James W. Smith

13 papers receiving 371 citations

Hit Papers

The Religious Factor19612026198220041961100200300400

Peers

James W. Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
  • Sociology and Political Science 338
  • Health 156
  • Hardware and Architecture 73
  • Political Science and International Relations 64
  • Demography 58
Replace Jan Gray with:
Jan Gray Australia
Robert L. Young United States
Allan Heaton Anderson United States
Timothy W. Jones Australia
Sam Kamin United States
Dean Kelley United States
Dong Zhou China
Matthew Robinson United States
Ralph Adams Brown Canada
Norbert Schneider Germany
James W. Smith relative to Jan Gray Australia Jan Gray's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Jan Gray · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James W. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James W. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James W. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James W. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James W. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James W. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James W. Smith. The network helps show where James W. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of James W. Smith

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James W. Smith. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James W. Smith based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James W. Smith. James W. Smith is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 3
2
BRIDGING THE GAP BETWEEN "ROCKS FOR JOCKS" AND THE MARS SAMPLE RETURN PROGRAM: Using NASA Resources and Remote Access to Promote Geology
1
3 0
4
The Plasmoid Thruster Experiment (PTX)
0
5 19
6
Allocation and interface synthesis algorithms for component-based design
0
7 40
8 28
9 13
10 1
11 7
12 5
13 9
14 13
15 1
16
The Religious Factorbreakdown →
444

About James W. Smith

James W. Smith is a scholar working on Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, Hardware and Architecture and Software, having authored 16 papers that have together received 584 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Embedded Systems Design Techniques (3 papers), Planetary Science and Exploration (2 papers) and Space Exploration and Technology (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (156 citations), Hardware and Architecture (73 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (338 citations). James W. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Gerhard Lenski, A. Leland Jamison, Giovanni De Micheli, Stephen R. Jones, Mary Ann B. Meador, James R. Gaier, T.H. Braid, L. Meyer-Schützmeister, Brandon Rodriguez and M. Josefina Arellano-Jiménez. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Ceramic Society, Journal of Applied Polymer Science and The American Journal of the Medical Sciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026