James van Gelder
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 10%
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health top 10%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Neurology
- Surgery
- Co-authors
- Charles TeoMarianne VonauRobert JonesBernard KwokWarwick SteningPhilip BoughtonAlessandra DoolanAndrew J. Ruys
- Topics
- Cerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus (3 papers)Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders (2 papers)Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment (2 papers)
- Cited by
- Cellular and Molecular NeurosciencePediatrics, Perinatology and Child HealthPublic Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited States
In The Last Decade
James van Gelder
10 papers receiving 354 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 172
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 159
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 125
- Neurology 63
- Surgery 55
Countries citing papers authored by James van Gelder
This map shows the geographic impact of James van Gelder's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James van Gelder with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James van Gelder more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James van Gelder
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James van Gelder. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James van Gelder. The network helps show where James van Gelder may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of James van Gelder
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James van Gelder. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James van Gelder based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James van Gelder. James van Gelder is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 33 | |
| 3 | 18 | |
| 4 | 10 | |
| 5 | 54 | |
| 6 | 90 | |
| 7 | 78 | |
| 8 | 6 | |
| 9 | 12 | |
| 10 | 7 | |
| 11 | 56 |
About James van Gelder
James van Gelder is a scholar working on Developmental Neuroscience, Modeling and Simulation and Genetics, having authored 11 papers that have together received 364 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus (3 papers), Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders (2 papers) and Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (172 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (159 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (125 citations). James van Gelder has collaborated with scholars based in Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Charles Teo, Marianne Vonau, Robert Jones, Bernard Kwok, Warwick Stening, Philip Boughton, Alessandra Doolan, Andrew J. Ruys, Randall K. Holmes and Edward L. Goodman. Their work appears in journals such as Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, Neurosurgery and Cancers.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.