James T. Enns
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 0.1%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 0.5%
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition top 0.5%
- Social Psychology top 0.5%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 1%
- Co-authors
- Vincent Di LolloRonald A. RensinkChristopher G. HealeyLana M. TrickDarlene A. BrodeurJun‐ichiro KawaharaJacob A. BurackNameera Akhtar
- Topics
- Visual perception and processing mechanisms (129 papers)Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (97 papers)Neural dynamics and brain function (38 papers)
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
James T. Enns
233 papers receiving 9.7k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 174
- Cognitive Neuroscience 7.9k
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 2.1k
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 1.6k
- Social Psychology 1.6k
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 996
Countries citing papers authored by James T. Enns
This map shows the geographic impact of James T. Enns's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James T. Enns with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James T. Enns more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James T. Enns
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James T. Enns. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James T. Enns. The network helps show where James T. Enns may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of James T. Enns
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James T. Enns. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James T. Enns based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James T. Enns. James T. Enns is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 8 | |
| 7 | 63 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | Perception of collaboration in joint musical performances. | 0 |
| 11 | Collaborative coactivation in visual search. | 1 |
| 12 | 4 | |
| 13 | 2 | |
| 14 | 17 | |
| 15 | 50 | |
| 16 | 6 | |
| 17 | 45 | |
| 18 | 156 | |
| 19 | Attention, Development, and Psychopathology | 91 |
| 20 | 84 |
About James T. Enns
James T. Enns is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Human-Computer Interaction, having authored 243 papers that have together received 10.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (129 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (97 papers) and Neural dynamics and brain function (38 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (7.9k citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (2.1k citations) and Sensory Systems (419 citations). James T. Enns has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Vincent Di Lollo, Ronald A. Rensink, Christopher G. Healey, Lana M. Trick, Darlene A. Brodeur, Jun‐ichiro Kawahara, Jacob A. Burack, Nameera Akhtar, Alejandro Lleras and Shahab Ghorashi. Their work appears in journals such as Science, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and Nature Communications.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.