James S. Starman
- Surgery top 5%
- Orthopedics and Sports Medicine top 2%
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Epidemiology
- Health top 5%
- Co-authors
- Freddie H. FuMário FerrettiJames J. IrrgangFotios P. TjoumakarisAnthony M. BuoncristianiWeiliang ShenMadhav A. KarunakarAnikar Chhabra
- Topics
- Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques (11 papers)Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes (10 papers)Sports injuries and prevention (7 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Bone and Joint SurgeryThe American Journal of Sports MedicineClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research
- Partner nations
- United StatesGermanyAfghanistan
In The Last Decade
James S. Starman
20 papers receiving 1.0k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
- Surgery 862
- Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 453
- General Health Professions 144
- Epidemiology 130
- Health 114
Countries citing papers authored by James S. Starman
This map shows the geographic impact of James S. Starman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James S. Starman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James S. Starman more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James S. Starman
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James S. Starman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James S. Starman. The network helps show where James S. Starman may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of James S. Starman
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James S. Starman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James S. Starman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James S. Starman. James S. Starman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 54 | |
| 2 | 45 | |
| 3 | 27 | |
| 4 | 9 | |
| 5 | 34 | |
| 6 | 131 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 23 | |
| 9 | 8 | |
| 10 | 43 | |
| 11 | 168 | |
| 12 | 31 | |
| 13 | 3 | |
| 14 | 22 | |
| 15 | 141 | |
| 16 | 38 | |
| 17 | 26 | |
| 18 | 212 | |
| 19 | 23 | |
| 20 | Anatomic ACL reconstruction | 6 |
About James S. Starman
James S. Starman is a scholar working on Medical Terminology, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine and Health Informatics, having authored 20 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques (11 papers), Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes (10 papers) and Sports injuries and prevention (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (453 citations), Surgery (862 citations) and Health (114 citations). James S. Starman has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Afghanistan. Frequent co-authors include Freddie H. Fu, Mário Ferretti, James J. Irrgang, Fotios P. Tjoumakaris, Anthony M. Buoncristiani, Weiliang Shen, Madhav A. Karunakar, Anikar Chhabra, Thore Zantop and Armando F. Vidal. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, The American Journal of Sports Medicine and Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.