James R. Otteson
- Philosophy top 5%
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory 4
-
- Political Philosophy and Ethics 6
- American Constitutional Law and Politics 2
-
- Ethics in Business and Education 2
- Religious studies top 10%
- Religion, Gender, and Enlightenment 1
-
- Economic Theory and Institutions 4
-
- Political Economy and Marxism 4
-
- Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting 2
- Co-authors
- Charles L. GriswoldTim LoughranBill McDonaldAdam SmithJohn T. ScottChristopher J. BerryCraig R. SmithBarry R. Weingast
- Journals
- Journal of Business Ethics (1 paper)Philosophy and Phenomenological Research (1 paper)Mind (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
James R. Otteson
24 papers receiving 207 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 40
- Philosophy 82
- Political Science and International Relations 88
- General Decision Sciences 6
- Information Systems and Management 21
- Religious studies 15
Countries citing papers authored by James R. Otteson
This map shows the geographic impact of James R. Otteson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James R. Otteson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James R. Otteson more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James R. Otteson
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James R. Otteson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James R. Otteson. The network helps show where James R. Otteson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 14 scholars most cited alongside James R. Otteson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2023 | 2 | |
| 3 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 4 | 2022 | 15 | |
| 5 | 2021 | 1 | |
| 6 | 2020 | 0 | |
| 7 | 2017 | 3 | |
| 8 | 2016 | 0 | |
| 9 | 2014 | 3 | |
| 10 | 2013 | 5 | |
| 11 | 2012 | 1 | |
| 12 | Adam Smith: Selected Philosophical Writings | 2012 | 5 |
| 13 | 2010 | 7 | |
| 14 | 2010 | 1 | |
| 15 | 2008 | 2 | |
| 16 | 2007 | 1 | |
| 17 | 2002 | 3 | |
| 18 | The Recurring "Adam Smith Problem" | 2000 | 11 |
| 19 | Limits on Our Obligation to Give | 2000 | 4 |
| 20 | 2000 | 3 |
About James R. Otteson
James R. Otteson is a scholar working on Philosophy, Political Science and International Relations and Information Systems and Management, having authored 29 papers that have together received 229 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Political Philosophy and Ethics (6 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (4 papers), Economic Theory and Institutions (4 papers), Political Economy and Marxism (4 papers), Ethics in Business and Education (2 papers), Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting (2 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (2 papers) and Religion, Gender, and Enlightenment (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (82 citations), Political Science and International Relations (88 citations) and General Decision Sciences (6 citations). James R. Otteson has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Charles L. Griswold, Tim Loughran, Bill McDonald, Adam Smith, John T. Scott, Christopher J. Berry, Craig R. Smith, Barry R. Weingast, Lisa Hill and Paul Sagar. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Business Ethics, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research and Mind.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.