John T. Scott

167 papers receiving 3.9k citations

Peers

John T. Scott
Comparison fields: 5 of 149
  • Economics and Econometrics 2.4k
  • Strategy and Management 1.6k
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 1.2k
  • Accounting 733
  • Political Science and International Relations 448
Replace Robert J. Bennett with:
Robert J. Bennett United Kingdom
Ilan Vertinsky Canada
Dominique Foray Switzerland
Philip Cooke Norway
Ann Markusen United States
Paulo Guimarães United States
Ulrich Schmoch Germany
Frank van Oort Netherlands
Robin Cowan Netherlands
Wilfred Dolfsma Netherlands
John T. Scott relative to Robert J. Bennett United Kingdom Robert J. Bennett's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Robert J. Bennett · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John T. Scott

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John T. Scott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John T. Scott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John T. Scott more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John T. Scott

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John T. Scott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John T. Scott. The network helps show where John T. Scott may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of John T. Scott

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John T. Scott. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John T. Scott based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John T. Scott. John T. Scott is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 1
2 2
3 0
4 3
5 5
6 4
7
Innovation Rivalry: Theory and Empirics
0
8 19
9 3
10 10
11 92
12
The National Cooperative Research and Production Act
11
13
ISO 9000 in service: The good, the bad, and the ugly
6
14
Human nature and history
1
15
Rousseau and the Revival of Humanism in Contemporary French Political Thought
1
16
The Growth of Research Triangle Park
7
17 17
18
Economics of technological change
3
19
Regulatory Standards and Emissions-Reducing R & D
1
20
Purposive Diversification and Economic Performance
83

About John T. Scott

John T. Scott is a scholar working on Management of Technology and Innovation, Economics and Econometrics and Strategy and Management, having authored 184 papers that have together received 4.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovation Policy and R&D (38 papers), Firm Innovation and Growth (24 papers) and Innovation and Knowledge Management (16 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management of Technology and Innovation (1.2k citations), Strategy and Management (1.6k citations) and Economics and Econometrics (2.4k citations). John T. Scott has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Albert N. Link, Stephen Martin, Bronwyn H. Hall, Brian H. Bornstein, David B. Audretsch, Richard E. Matland, Philip A. Michelbach, A. Michael Spence, Richard E. Caves and Michael E. Porter. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Chemical Physics, PLoS ONE and The Quarterly Journal of Economics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026