James R. M. Edwards
- Nutrition and Dietetics top 5%
- Surgery
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
- Biochemistry top 10%
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
- Co-authors
- Robert StuklisLeslie G. ClelandRobert A. GibsonMichael J. JamesRobert G. MetcalfKurt C. Roberts‐ThomsonGlenn D. YoungJohn Stubberfield
- Topics
- Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches (3 papers)Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (3 papers)Eicosanoids and Hypertension Pharmacology (2 papers)
- Journals
- CirculationSHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaAmerican Journal of Clinical Nutrition
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
James R. M. Edwards
9 papers receiving 319 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
- Nutrition and Dietetics 174
- Surgery 100
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 93
- Biochemistry 82
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 44
Countries citing papers authored by James R. M. Edwards
This map shows the geographic impact of James R. M. Edwards's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James R. M. Edwards with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James R. M. Edwards more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James R. M. Edwards
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James R. M. Edwards. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James R. M. Edwards. The network helps show where James R. M. Edwards may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of James R. M. Edwards
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James R. M. Edwards. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James R. M. Edwards based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James R. M. Edwards. James R. M. Edwards is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 18 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 5 | |
| 4 | 33 | |
| 5 | 48 | |
| 6 | 172 | |
| 7 | 12 | |
| 8 | 16 | |
| 9 | 4 | |
| 10 | 19 |
About James R. M. Edwards
James R. M. Edwards is a scholar working on Biochemistry, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 10 papers that have together received 327 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches (3 papers), Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (3 papers) and Eicosanoids and Hypertension Pharmacology (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nutrition and Dietetics (174 citations), Biochemistry (82 citations) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (93 citations). James R. M. Edwards has collaborated with scholars based in Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Robert Stuklis, Leslie G. Cleland, Robert A. Gibson, Michael J. James, Robert G. Metcalf, Kurt C. Roberts‐Thomson, Glenn D. Young, John Stubberfield, Michael Worthington and Alison L. Kent. Their work appears in journals such as Circulation, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and American Journal of Clinical Nutrition.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.