James O’Connor

873 total citations
8 papers, 249 citations indexed

About

James O’Connor is a scholar working on Ecology, Ecological Modeling and Global and Planetary Change. According to data from OpenAlex, James O’Connor has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 249 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Ecology, 4 papers in Ecological Modeling and 3 papers in Global and Planetary Change. Recurrent topics in James O’Connor's work include Species Distribution and Climate Change (4 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (4 papers) and Avian ecology and behavior (2 papers). James O’Connor is often cited by papers focused on Species Distribution and Climate Change (4 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (4 papers) and Avian ecology and behavior (2 papers). James O’Connor collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. James O’Connor's co-authors include Glenn Ehmke, Elisa Bayraktarov, Louise McRae, Hugh P. Possingham, David B. Lindenmayer, Stephen T. Garnett, Emma L. Burns, John C. Z. Woinarski, Rohan H. Clarke and Mélodie A. McGeoch and has published in prestigious journals such as Conservation Biology, Biological Conservation and Ecological Applications.

In The Last Decade

James O’Connor

8 papers receiving 242 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
James O’Connor Australia	6	161	140	100	77	31	8	249
Michael Opige United Kingdom	4	174 1.1×	153 1.1×	89 0.9×	83 1.1×	36 1.2×	8	285
Allison D. Binley Canada	10	127 0.8×	112 0.8×	60 0.6×	63 0.8×	39 1.3×	23	238
Eduardo Roberto Alexandrino Brazil	10	168 1.0×	90 0.6×	119 1.2×	51 0.7×	72 2.3×	23	278
Ruth Y. Oliver United States	8	210 1.3×	125 0.9×	48 0.5×	55 0.7×	44 1.4×	14	311
Matthew N. Foster United States	6	145 0.9×	73 0.5×	83 0.8×	108 1.4×	39 1.3×	8	255
Lianjun Zhao China	8	118 0.7×	88 0.6×	48 0.5×	73 0.9×	18 0.6×	15	203
Emilio Berti Germany	9	115 0.7×	93 0.7×	73 0.7×	44 0.6×	53 1.7×	20	250
Rodrigo Assis de Carvalho Brazil	8	100 0.6×	74 0.5×	204 2.0×	49 0.6×	36 1.2×	26	297
Katherine M. O’Donnell United States	11	173 1.1×	138 1.0×	126 1.3×	212 2.8×	57 1.8×	18	324
Sven Trautmann Germany	4	124 0.8×	100 0.7×	91 0.9×	39 0.5×	54 1.7×	8	190

Countries citing papers authored by James O’Connor

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James O’Connor's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James O’Connor with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James O’Connor more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James O’Connor

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James O’Connor. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James O’Connor. The network helps show where James O’Connor may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of James O’Connor

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James O’Connor. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James O’Connor based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James O’Connor. James O’Connor is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

8 of 8 papers shown

1.

Bayraktarov, Elisa, Glenn Ehmke, Ayesha Tulloch, et al.. (2020). A threatened species index for Australian birds. Conservation Science and Practice. 3(2). 24 indexed citations

2.

Bayraktarov, Elisa, Glenn Ehmke, James O’Connor, et al.. (2019). Do Big Unstructured Biodiversity Data Mean More Knowledge?. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution. 6. 99 indexed citations

3.

Gosper, Carl R., Simon J. Watson, Elizabeth A. Fox, et al.. (2019). Fire‐mediated habitat change regulates woodland bird species and functional group occurrence. Ecological Applications. 29(8). e01997–e01997. 24 indexed citations

4.

Steven, Rochelle, Megan Barnes, Stephen T. Garnett, et al.. (2019). Aligning citizen science with best practice: Threatened species conservation in Australia. Conservation Science and Practice. 1(10). 25 indexed citations

5.

Baker, D. James, Stephen T. Garnett, James O’Connor, et al.. (2018). Conserving the abundance of nonthreatened species. Conservation Biology. 33(2). 319–328. 52 indexed citations

6.

Gosper, Carl R., Elizabeth A. Fox, Allan H. Burbidge, et al.. (2018). Multi-century periods since fire in an intact woodland landscape favour bird species declining in an adjacent agricultural region. Biological Conservation. 230. 82–90. 22 indexed citations

7.

Robinson, Doug, Lisa Smallbone, & James O’Connor. (2012). Biodiversity monitoring from a community organisation perspective. 141–147. 1 indexed citations

8.

Buchanan, Katherine L. & James O’Connor. (2012). Hybridisation and the future of austral ornithology. Emu - Austral Ornithology. 112(1). i–ii. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact