James N. VerHoeve
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging top 5%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
- Molecular Biology
- Dermatology top 10%
- Ophthalmology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Janis T. EellsMargaret T.T. Wong‐RileyMichele M. HenryMarti JettRina DasBrian D. HodgsonLisa J. GouldÜlker Tulunay-Keesey
- Topics
- Retinal Development and Disorders (3 papers)Laser Applications in Dentistry and Medicine (3 papers)Ocular and Laser Science Research (2 papers)
- Cited by
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and ImagingComplementary and Manual TherapyCellular and Molecular Neuroscience
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
James N. VerHoeve
8 papers receiving 431 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 318
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 109
- Molecular Biology 91
- Dermatology 46
- Ophthalmology 46
Countries citing papers authored by James N. VerHoeve
This map shows the geographic impact of James N. VerHoeve's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James N. VerHoeve with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James N. VerHoeve more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James N. VerHoeve
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James N. VerHoeve. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James N. VerHoeve. The network helps show where James N. VerHoeve may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of James N. VerHoeve
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James N. VerHoeve. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James N. VerHoeve based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James N. VerHoeve. James N. VerHoeve is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 18 | |
| 3 | 8 | |
| 4 | 365 | |
| 5 | DARPA Soldier Self Care: Rapid Healing of Laser Eye Injuries with Light Emitting Diode Technology | 10 |
| 6 | 6 | |
| 7 | 21 | |
| 8 | 18 |
About James N. VerHoeve
James N. VerHoeve is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 8 papers that have together received 447 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Retinal Development and Disorders (3 papers), Laser Applications in Dentistry and Medicine (3 papers) and Ocular and Laser Science Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (318 citations), Complementary and Manual Therapy (14 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (109 citations). James N. VerHoeve has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Janis T. Eells, Margaret T.T. Wong‐Riley, Michele M. Henry, Marti Jett, Rina Das, Brian D. Hodgson, Lisa J. Gould, Ülker Tulunay-Keesey, Joel M. Weinstein and Carey D. Balaban. Their work appears in journals such as Brain Research, Vision Research and Experimental Neurology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.