James Mitchell

29 papers receiving 630 citations

Peers

James Mitchell
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
  • Clinical Psychology 356
  • Applied Psychology 37
  • Cancer Research 61
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 59
  • Radiation 37
Replace Tsung‐Min Hung with:
Tsung‐Min Hung Taiwan
Alison Scope United Kingdom
Jessica Murphy Canada
Lucas Lim Singapore
T. Ashikaga United States
Dina Tell United States
Diana Winston United States
Peter Link United States
Kate Lifford United Kingdom
Fan Xiang China
James Mitchell relative to Tsung‐Min Hung Taiwan Tsung‐Min Hung's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×16.2×
Tsung‐Min Hung · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James Mitchell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Mitchell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Mitchell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Mitchell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Mitchell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Mitchell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Mitchell. The network helps show where James Mitchell may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James Mitchell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James Mitchell Line = papers co-authored together James Mitchell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005237
2 200145
3 200742
4 201234
5 200934
6 200133
7 200426
8 201624
9 202024
10 202019
11 199517
12 202017
13 201416
14 201013
15 199511
16 202010
17 20079
18 19839
19 20038
20 19897

About James Mitchell

James Mitchell is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Radiation, Surgery and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 32 papers that have together received 659 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Eating Disorders and Behaviors (8 papers), Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques (4 papers), Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation (2 papers), Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry (2 papers), Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (2 papers), Sport Psychology and Performance (2 papers), Reproductive Biology and Fertility (2 papers) and Sports injuries and prevention (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (356 citations), Applied Psychology (37 citations), Cancer Research (61 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (59 citations) and Radiation (37 citations). James Mitchell has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Scott J. Crow, Susan W. Bryson, Katherine A. Halmi, Helena C. Kraemer, G. Terence Wilson, W. Stewart Agras, Silvia C. Formenti, J. Keith DeWyngaert, Stephen A. Wonderlich and Ross D. Crosby. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, International Journal of Eating Disorders, Pharmaceutics, International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance and Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact