James Mitchell

30 papers receiving 492 citations

Peers

James Mitchell
Comparison fields: 5 of 115
  • Health Informatics 136
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 21
  • Small Animals 70
  • Health Information Management 40
  • Ecology 188
Replace Tammie Bettinger with:
Tammie Bettinger United States
Jane Johnson Australia
Violeta Berdejo‐Espinola Australia
John Jackson United Kingdom
Bishnu Prasad Devkota Nepal
P.J. White Ireland
Jennifer McDonald United Kingdom
E. Hance Ellington United States
Emma Medin Sweden
P. Ellis United Kingdom
James Mitchell relative to Tammie Bettinger United States Tammie Bettinger's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×20×40×68×
Tammie Bettinger · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James Mitchell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Mitchell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Mitchell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Mitchell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Mitchell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Mitchell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Mitchell. The network helps show where James Mitchell may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James Mitchell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James Mitchell Line = papers co-authored together James Mitchell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2021182
2 196142
3 200740
4 202433
5 199732
6 199830
7
Takeover: Explaining the Extraordinary Rise of the SNP
201628
8 200726
9 200918
10 201914
11
Pond apple - are the endangered cassowary and feral pig helping this weed to invade Queensland's Wet Tropics?
200212
12 201412
13 199211
14 20198
15 20067
16 20216
17 20176
18 20116
19 20225
20 20095

About James Mitchell

James Mitchell is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Ecology, Small Animals, Genetics and History, having authored 35 papers that have together received 551 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies (8 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (8 papers), Political Systems and Governance (6 papers), Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (5 papers), Scottish History and National Identity (5 papers), Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (3 papers), Vietnamese History and Culture Studies (3 papers) and Mobile Health and mHealth Applications (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (136 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (21 citations), Small Animals (70 citations), Health Information Management (40 citations) and Ecology (188 citations). James Mitchell has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Robert J. Mayer, JC Mcilroy, Robert Johns, Laura‐Maria Peltonen, Lorraine J. Block, Maxim Topaz, Mollie Hobensack, Hanna von Gerich, Hans Moen and Charlene Ronquillo. Their work appears in journals such as Wildlife Research, International Journal of Nursing Studies, Yearbook of Medical Informatics, Nations and Nationalism and The Political Quarterly.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact