James M. Stringham

1.5k total citations
39 papers, 1.2k citations indexed

About

James M. Stringham is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Biochemistry and Cognitive Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, James M. Stringham has authored 39 papers receiving a total of 1.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 22 papers in Ophthalmology, 18 papers in Biochemistry and 15 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in James M. Stringham's work include Antioxidant Activity and Oxidative Stress (18 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (16 papers) and Visual perception and processing mechanisms (15 papers). James M. Stringham is often cited by papers focused on Antioxidant Activity and Oxidative Stress (18 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (16 papers) and Visual perception and processing mechanisms (15 papers). James M. Stringham collaborates with scholars based in United States, Ireland and Canada. James M. Stringham's co-authors include Billy R. Hammond, Adam J. Wenzel, Kenneth Fuld, D. Max Snodderly, Billy R. Hammond, John M. Nolan, Kevin O’Brien, Philip V. Holmes, Leon N. McLin and Peter A. Smith and has published in prestigious journals such as The FASEB Journal, Vision Research and Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science.

In The Last Decade

James M. Stringham

38 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
James M. Stringham 568 505 317 262 196 39 1.2k
Billy R. Wooten 1.1k 1.9× 897 1.8× 568 1.8× 502 1.9× 284 1.4× 32 1.7k
Lisa Renzi‐Hammond 284 0.5× 743 1.5× 351 1.1× 152 0.6× 137 0.7× 73 1.4k
Billy R. Hammond 664 1.2× 859 1.7× 494 1.6× 286 1.1× 83 0.4× 44 1.4k
Maı̈a Miguelez 64 0.1× 34 0.1× 86 0.3× 29 0.1× 82 0.4× 25 642
J. M. Rabey 13 0.0× 21 0.0× 205 0.6× 24 0.1× 175 0.9× 62 1.5k
Shlomit Dachir 93 0.2× 3 0.0× 203 0.6× 252 1.0× 142 0.7× 55 1.2k
Tomasz Kocki 34 0.1× 14 0.0× 399 1.3× 12 0.0× 11 0.1× 87 1.5k
Elvira de la Peña 10 0.0× 35 0.1× 360 1.1× 23 0.1× 80 0.4× 20 1.2k
Luis F. Alguacil 7 0.0× 44 0.1× 388 1.2× 8 0.0× 80 0.4× 77 1.2k

Countries citing papers authored by James M. Stringham

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James M. Stringham's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James M. Stringham with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James M. Stringham more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James M. Stringham

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James M. Stringham. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James M. Stringham. The network helps show where James M. Stringham may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of James M. Stringham

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James M. Stringham. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James M. Stringham based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James M. Stringham. James M. Stringham is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Stringham, James M., et al.. (2020). Visual Crowding in Glaucoma: Structural and Functional Relationships. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 61(7). 3214–3214. 3 indexed citations
2.
Holmes, Philip V., et al.. (2019). Effects of macular xanthophyll supplementation on brain-derived neurotrophic factor, pro-inflammatory cytokines, and cognitive performance. Physiology & Behavior. 211. 112650–112650. 50 indexed citations
3.
Stringham, James M., Elizabeth J. Johnson, & Billy R. Hammond. (2019). Lutein across the Lifespan: From Childhood Cognitive Performance to the Aging Eye and Brain. Current Developments in Nutrition. 3(7). nzz066–nzz066. 61 indexed citations
4.
Stringham, James M., et al.. (2016). Serum and retinal responses to three different doses of macular carotenoids over 12 weeks of supplementation. Experimental Eye Research. 151. 1–8. 22 indexed citations
5.
Stringham, James M., et al.. (2016). Macular carotenoid supplementation improves disability glare performance and dynamics of photostress recovery. Eye and Vision. 3(1). 30–30. 26 indexed citations
6.
Stringham, James M., et al.. (2015). Macular Pigment and Visual Performance in Low-Light Conditions. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 56(4). 2459–2459. 29 indexed citations
7.
Sabatinelli, Dean, et al.. (2013). A potential mechanism for compensation in the blue—yellow visual channel. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 7. 331–331. 5 indexed citations
8.
Snodderly, D. Max & James M. Stringham. (2009). Macular Pigment Reduces Visual Discomfort. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 50(13). 1702–1702. 1 indexed citations
9.
McLin, Leon N., et al.. (2009). Disability Glare From Red and Green Laser Sources. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 50(13). 2002–2002.
10.
Stringham, James M., Emily R. Bovier, Jennifer C. Wong, & Billy R. Hammond. (2009). The Influence of Dietary Lutein and Zeaxanthin on Visual Performance. Journal of Food Science. 75(1). R24–9. 38 indexed citations
11.
Stringham, James M. & Billy R. Hammond. (2008). Macular Pigment and Visual Performance Under Glare Conditions. Optometry and Vision Science. 85(2). 82–88. 136 indexed citations
12.
Stringham, James M., Billy R. Hammond, John M. Nolan, et al.. (2008). The utility of using customized heterochromatic flicker photometry (cHFP) to measure macular pigment in patients with age-related macular degeneration. Experimental Eye Research. 87(5). 445–453. 83 indexed citations
13.
Stringham, James M. & Billy R. Hammond. (2007). Compensation for light loss due to filtering by macular pigment: relation to hue cancellation. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics. 27(3). 232–237. 25 indexed citations
14.
Wenzel, Adam J., et al.. (2007). Macular pigment optical density at four retinal loci during 120 days of lutein supplementation. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics. 27(4). 329–335. 28 indexed citations
15.
Wenzel, Adam J., Kenneth Fuld, James M. Stringham, & Joanne Curran‐Celentano. (2006). Macular pigment optical density and photophobia light threshold. Vision Research. 46(28). 4615–4622. 38 indexed citations
16.
Stringham, James M., Billy R. Hammond, Billy R. Wooten, & D. Max Snodderly. (2006). Compensation for Light Loss Resulting From Filtering by Macular Pigment: Relation to the S-Cone Pathway. Optometry and Vision Science. 83(12). 887–894. 29 indexed citations
17.
Stringham, James M. & Billy R. Hammond. (2005). Dietary Lutein and Zeaxanthin: Possible Effects on Visual Function. Nutrition Reviews. 63(2). 59–64. 42 indexed citations
18.
Sheehan, Joseph, et al.. (2004). Macular pigment optical density at four retinal loci during 120 days of lutein supplementation. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 45(13). 1291–1291. 1 indexed citations
19.
Stringham, James M., Kenneth Fuld, & Adam J. Wenzel. (2003). Action spectrum for photophobia. Journal of the Optical Society of America A. 20(10). 1852–1852. 90 indexed citations
20.
Wenzel, Adam J., Kenneth Fuld, & James M. Stringham. (2003). Light Exposure and Macular Pigment Optical Density. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 44(1). 306–306. 14 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026