James Levine

17 papers receiving 212 citations

Peers

James Levine
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Theoretical Computer Science 18
  • History and Philosophy of Science 62
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 110
  • Philosophy 69
  • Language and Linguistics 59
Replace Salvador Mascarenhas with:
Salvador Mascarenhas France
Donald L. M. Baxter United States
Paolo Parrini Italy
Mu-Chou Poo Hong Kong
G. W. Beadle United States
D. W. Robertson United States
Christopher Middleton Australia
Estrella Montolío Durán Spain
Ulrika Magnusson Sweden
John Beatty Canada
James Levine relative to Salvador Mascarenhas France Salvador Mascarenhas's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.9×
Salvador Mascarenhas · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James Levine

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Levine's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Levine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Levine more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Levine

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Levine. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Levine. The network helps show where James Levine may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 7 scholars most cited alongside James Levine, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James Levine Line = papers co-authored together James Levine links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 196369
2 196540
3 200135
4 199635
5 198233
6 198926
7 200219
8 19845
9 19985
10 19934
11 20044
12 20103
13
From absolute idealism to the Principles of Mathematics
19982
14 20062
15
Towards a transformational account of derived adjectives in Russian
19771
16
The most beautiful opera houses in the world
20131
17 19931
18 20011
19
In grand style : the glory of the Metropolitan Opera
20060
20 20150

About James Levine

James Levine is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Philosophy, Language and Linguistics and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 25 papers that have together received 286 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy, Science, and History (10 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (10 papers), linguistics and terminology studies (3 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (3 papers), Natural Language Processing Techniques (2 papers), Discourse Analysis and Cultural Communication (2 papers), Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education (2 papers) and Classical Philosophy and Thought (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Theoretical Computer Science (18 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (62 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (110 citations), Philosophy (69 citations) and Language and Linguistics (59 citations). James Levine has collaborated with scholars based in Ireland and United States. Frequent co-authors include Julius Marmur, Edna Seaman, Norman Strauss, Thomas Ricketts, Richard D. Brecht, Charles Jones and Joseph J. Volpe. Their work appears in journals such as The Slavic and East European Journal, Journal of Bacteriology, The Philosophical Review, Synthese and Philosophy and Phenomenological Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact