Mu-Chou Poo

469 citations
14 papers · 151 · h-index 8

Impact in

  • Archeology top 5%
    • Ancient Egypt and Archaeology
    • Archaeology and Historical Studies
    • Ancient Near East History
    • Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
    • Language, Linguistics, Cultural Analysis

Papers in

Mu-Chou Poo

12 papers receiving 108 citations

Peers

Mu-Chou Poo
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
  • Archeology 43
  • Archeology 4
  • Language and Linguistics 37
  • Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management 4
  • Cultural Studies 21
Replace António Loprieno with:
António Loprieno United States
В.В. Иванов Russia
Jaan Puhvel United States
Anna Morpurgo Davies United States
Yves Bonnefoy France
Václav Blažek Czechia
David F. Mora‐Marín United States
Tamsin Donaldson Australia
Antonio Τovar France
David Diringer
Mu-Chou Poo relative to António Loprieno United States António Loprieno's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.7×
António Loprieno · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mu-Chou Poo

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mu-Chou Poo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mu-Chou Poo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mu-Chou Poo more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mu-Chou Poo

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mu-Chou Poo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mu-Chou Poo. The network helps show where Mu-Chou Poo may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 1 scholars most cited alongside Mu-Chou Poo, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mu-Chou Poo Line = papers co-authored together Mu-Chou Poo links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 199764
2
Wine & Wine Offering In The Religion Of Ancient Egypt
199514
3 199714
4 199913
5
Ideas Concerning Death and Burial in Pre-Han and Han China
199010
6 19939
7 20058
8 20227
9 20126
10 19954
11 20231
12 20181
13
Liquids in Temple Ritual
20100
14 19970

About Mu-Chou Poo

Mu-Chou Poo is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Archeology, Anthropology, Cultural Studies and Religious studies, having authored 14 papers that have together received 151 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Chinese history and philosophy (8 papers), Ancient Egypt and Archaeology (5 papers), Archaeology and Historical Studies (3 papers), Japanese History and Culture (2 papers), Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices (2 papers), Ancient Mediterranean Archaeology and History (2 papers), Indian and Buddhist Studies (1 paper) and Language, Linguistics, Cultural Analysis (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Archeology (43 citations), Archeology (4 citations), Language and Linguistics (37 citations), Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management (4 citations) and Cultural Studies (21 citations). Mu-Chou Poo has collaborated with scholars based in Hong Kong and United States. Frequent co-authors include António Loprieno. Their work appears in journals such as The International Journal of African Historical Studies, Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient, T oung Pao, Numen and eScholarship (California Digital Library).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact