James L. Sherald
- Plant Science top 5%
- Horticulture top 0.5%
- Cell Biology top 10%
- Insect Science top 5%
- Molecular Biology
- Co-authors
- Mariam B. SticklenH. D. SislerAndrew J. McElroneIrwin N. ForsethStanley J. KostkaT. C. HarringtonMargaret R. PoolerJo‐Ann Bentz
- Topics
- Phytoplasmas and Hemiptera pathogens (17 papers)Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (10 papers)Cocoa and Sweet Potato Agronomy (8 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesSouth Korea
In The Last Decade
James L. Sherald
32 papers receiving 716 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
- Plant Science 654
- Horticulture 192
- Cell Biology 177
- Insect Science 166
- Molecular Biology 141
Countries citing papers authored by James L. Sherald
This map shows the geographic impact of James L. Sherald's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James L. Sherald with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James L. Sherald more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James L. Sherald
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James L. Sherald. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James L. Sherald. The network helps show where James L. Sherald may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of James L. Sherald
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James L. Sherald. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James L. Sherald based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James L. Sherald. James L. Sherald is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Effect of the Growth Regulator Paclobutrazol on Growth of the Bacterial Pathogen Xylella fastidiosa | 3 |
| 2 | 9 | |
| 3 | 13 | |
| 4 | 79 | |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | Transmission of the xylem-limited bacterium Xylella fastidiosa to shade trees by insect vectors. | 5 |
| 7 | 73 | |
| 8 | 15 | |
| 9 | 52 | |
| 10 | 27 | |
| 11 | 15 | |
| 12 | 27 | |
| 13 | Bacterial leaf scorch of landscape trees. | 3 |
| 14 | 26 | |
| 15 | 15 | |
| 16 | 5 | |
| 17 | 60 | |
| 18 | 2 | |
| 19 | 24 | |
| 20 | 22 |
About James L. Sherald
James L. Sherald is a scholar working on Horticulture, Plant Science and Cell Biology, having authored 33 papers that have together received 839 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Phytoplasmas and Hemiptera pathogens (17 papers), Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (10 papers) and Cocoa and Sweet Potato Agronomy (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Horticulture (192 citations), Plant Science (654 citations) and Insect Science (166 citations). James L. Sherald has collaborated with scholars based in United States and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include Mariam B. Sticklen, H. D. Sisler, Andrew J. McElrone, Irwin N. Forseth, Stanley J. Kostka, T. C. Harrington, Margaret R. Pooler, Jo‐Ann Bentz, Nancy Ragsdale and Qi Huang. Their work appears in journals such as PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, Journal of Experimental Botany and Plant and Cell Physiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.