Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Marital Disruption, Parent-Child Relationships, and Behavior Problems in Children
1986964 citationsJames L. Peterson et al.profile →
Countries citing papers authored by James L. Peterson
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of James L. Peterson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James L. Peterson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James L. Peterson more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James L. Peterson
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James L. Peterson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James L. Peterson. The network helps show where James L. Peterson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of James L. Peterson
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James L. Peterson.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James L. Peterson based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with James L. Peterson. James L. Peterson is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Brock, Bishop, Gary D. Carpenter, Eli Chiprout, et al.. (1999). Windows NT in a ccNUMA system. 7–7.3 indexed citations
3.
Card, Josefina J., Catherine G. Greeno, & James L. Peterson. (1992). Planning an Evaluation and Estimating Its Cost. Evaluation & the Health Professions. 15(1). 75–89.2 indexed citations
4.
Silberschatz, Abraham, James L. Peterson, & Peter Galvin. (1991). Operating system concepts (3rd ed.). Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc. eBooks.17 indexed citations
Peterson, James L. & Abraham Silberschatz. (1985). Operating system concepts (2nd ed.). Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc. eBooks.25 indexed citations
Peterson, James L.. (1979). Work and Socioeconomic Life Cycles: An Agenda for Longitudinal Research.. Monthly labor review. 102(2). 23–27.106 indexed citations
15.
Peterson, James L.. (1979). Notes on a Workshop on Distributed Computing, Held at the Harvard Faculty Club, Cambridge, MA, 12-13 October 1978.. ACM SIGOPS Operating Systems Review. 13. 18–30.2 indexed citations
16.
Peterson, Candida C. & James L. Peterson. (1978). Reward Allocation and Academic versus Social Orientation toward School.. The Journal of Psychology. 100.1 indexed citations
Peterson, James L.. (1975). Extrasensory Abilities of Children: An Ignored Reality?.. Learning Research and Practice. 84(2). 79–82.1 indexed citations
19.
Peterson, James L., et al.. (1974). A Comparison of Models of Parallel Computation.. IFIP Congress. 466–470.21 indexed citations
20.
Peterson, Candida C. & James L. Peterson. (1973). Preference for sex of offspring as a measure of change in sex attitudes..10 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.