James L. McClain

476 citations
19 papers · 104 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

James L. McClain

18 papers receiving 68 citations

Peers

James L. McClain
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
  • Cultural Studies 46
  • Sociology and Political Science 54
  • Finance 10
  • Gender Studies 8
  • Museology 3
Replace Linda Grove with:
Linda Grove Japan
Donald H. Shively United States
David Dabydeen Australia
David Desser United States
Jean Stubbs United Kingdom
Gordon H. Chang United States
Patrick Bryan Jamaica
Yomi Braester United States
Sumiko Higashi United States
Gordon Martel Canada
James L. McClain relative to Linda Grove Japan Linda Grove's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Linda Grove · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James L. McClain

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James L. McClain's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James L. McClain with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James L. McClain more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James L. McClain

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James L. McClain. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James L. McClain. The network helps show where James L. McClain may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 10 scholars most cited alongside James L. McClain, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James L. McClain Line = papers co-authored together James L. McClain links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1
Japan: A Modern History
200130
2 199514
3 199611
4 20008
5 19837
6 19946
7 19924
8 19833
9 19923
10 19873
11 20003
12 19883
13 19902
14 19922
15 19912
16
Early modern Japan
19911
17 19931
18 19961
19 19830

About James L. McClain

James L. McClain is a scholar working on Cultural Studies, Sociology and Political Science, Finance, Anthropology and Gender Studies, having authored 19 papers that have together received 104 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Japanese History and Culture (13 papers), Financial Crisis of the 21st Century (3 papers), Chinese history and philosophy (3 papers), Colonialism, slavery, and trade (2 papers), Global Maritime and Colonial Histories (2 papers), Sport and Mega-Event Impacts (1 paper), Vietnamese History and Culture Studies (1 paper) and Sports, Gender, and Society (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cultural Studies (46 citations), Sociology and Political Science (54 citations), Finance (10 citations), Gender Studies (8 citations) and Museology (3 citations). James L. McClain has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include John M. Merriman, Anne Walthall, Paul Waley, John W. Hall, Susan B. Hanley, William B. Hauser, William W. Kelly, Gilbert Rozman, Julia Adams and Charles Tilly. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Japanese Studies, The Journal of Interdisciplinary History, The International Journal of the History of Sport, Pacific Affairs and Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact