James L. Fozard

121 papers receiving 7.0k citations

Hit Papers

Age and gender comparisons of muscle strength in 654 wome...19972026200620161997250500750

Peers

James L. Fozard
Comparison fields: 5 of 187
  • Physiology 1.8k
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 1.6k
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 937
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 902
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 841
Replace Raija Korpelainen with:
Raija Korpelainen Finland
Neil Pendleton United Kingdom
Ralph H. B. Benedict United States
Eling D. de Bruin Switzerland
Robert W. Motl United States
Michelle W. Voss United States
John D. Fisk Canada
Paul D. Loprinzi United States
Louis Bherer Canada
Roee Holtzer United States
James L. Fozard relative to Raija Korpelainen Finland Raija Korpelainen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Raija Korpelainen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James L. Fozard

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James L. Fozard's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James L. Fozard with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James L. Fozard more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James L. Fozard

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James L. Fozard. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James L. Fozard. The network helps show where James L. Fozard may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of James L. Fozard

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James L. Fozard. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James L. Fozard based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James L. Fozard. James L. Fozard is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 6
2
Decreased Movement Path Tortuosity is Associated with Improved Functional Status in TBI Patients.
1
3 2
4 10
5 45
6
A Multidisciplinary Challenge of Benefits and Risks: Preventive Health Engineering in Earlier and Later Life
0
7 3
8 13
9 137
10 217
11 178
12 444
13 52
14 135
15 107
16 4
17 11
18 2
19 87
20 86

About James L. Fozard

James L. Fozard is a scholar working on Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation and Demography, having authored 135 papers that have together received 7.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Technology Use by Older Adults (18 papers), Memory Processes and Influences (11 papers) and Aging and Gerontology Research (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (269 citations), Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (668 citations) and Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (937 citations). James L. Fozard has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include E. Jeffrey Metter, J. D. Tobin, Larry J. Brant, E. J. Metter, B. F. Hurley, J. L. Fleg, Tracey A. Roy, R. S. Lindle, N. A. Lynch and E. Jeffrey Metter. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Applied Psychology, American Psychologist and Neurology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026