James J. Thomas

476 citations
25 papers · 306 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

James J. Thomas

25 papers receiving 299 citations

Peers

James J. Thomas
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
  • Toxicology 36
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 51
  • Reproductive Medicine 58
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 79
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 18
Replace R. Bakshi with:
R. Bakshi Switzerland
Anders Ölund Sweden
Holly Kelly United States
Maria Payne United States
Blessed Winston Aruldhas India
Marzena Wojewódzka‐Żeleźniakowicz Poland
F.E.R. Simons Canada
Hans-Peter Zahradnik Germany
Pathma D. Joseph Australia
David C. Winston United States
James J. Thomas relative to R. Bakshi Switzerland R. Bakshi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.5×
R. Bakshi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James J. Thomas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James J. Thomas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James J. Thomas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James J. Thomas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James J. Thomas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James J. Thomas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James J. Thomas. The network helps show where James J. Thomas may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James J. Thomas, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James J. Thomas Line = papers co-authored together James J. Thomas links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201164
2 199761
3 201137
4 202122
5 202122
6 201815
7 201813
8 201812
9 201911
10 20199
11 19866
12 20156
13 20195
14 20194
15 20214
16 20222
17 20142
18 20202
19 20172
20 20202

About James J. Thomas

James J. Thomas is a scholar working on Surgery, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine and Physiology, having authored 25 papers that have together received 306 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (5 papers), Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (4 papers), Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy (3 papers), Pediatric Pain Management Techniques (3 papers), Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment (3 papers), Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies (2 papers), Anesthesia and Pain Management (2 papers) and Biosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Toxicology (36 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (51 citations), Reproductive Medicine (58 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (79 citations) and Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (18 citations). James J. Thomas has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and India. Frequent co-authors include Jeffrey L. Galinkin, Uwe Christians, Keith L. Hoffman, Jenny Hall, Simon Fishel, Myron Yaster, David M. Polaner, David R. Drover, Brendan Carvalho and Larry F. Chu. Their work appears in journals such as Anesthesiology, Anesthesia & Analgesia, Pediatric Anesthesia, Nucleic Acids Research and Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact