James J. Neutens

667 total citations
18 papers, 482 citations indexed

About

James J. Neutens is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions and Family Practice. According to data from OpenAlex, James J. Neutens has authored 18 papers receiving a total of 482 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 4 papers in General Health Professions and 4 papers in Family Practice. Recurrent topics in James J. Neutens's work include Innovations in Medical Education (8 papers), Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (4 papers) and Surgical Simulation and Training (2 papers). James J. Neutens is often cited by papers focused on Innovations in Medical Education (8 papers), Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (4 papers) and Surgical Simulation and Training (2 papers). James J. Neutens collaborates with scholars based in United States and Qatar. James J. Neutens's co-authors include Laurna Rubinson, Maya M. Hammoud, Alice R. Goepfert, Eve Espey, Nadine T. Katz, Edward Peskin, Francis S. Nuthalapaty, Petra M. Casey, Thomas W. McDonald and J Kaczmarczyk and has published in prestigious journals such as American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gynecologic Oncology and Journal of School Health.

In The Last Decade

James J. Neutens

18 papers receiving 440 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
James J. Neutens United States 10 203 98 82 75 72 18 482
Robert Hilliard Canada 11 279 1.4× 108 1.1× 105 1.3× 64 0.9× 31 0.4× 17 496
Keng Sheng Chew Malaysia 14 142 0.7× 43 0.4× 45 0.5× 61 0.8× 51 0.7× 57 558
Roger Kneebone United Kingdom 15 196 1.0× 174 1.8× 120 1.5× 54 0.7× 191 2.7× 40 551
Megan M. Gray United States 16 185 0.9× 96 1.0× 134 1.6× 19 0.3× 115 1.6× 92 708
Warren Wiechmann United States 13 210 1.0× 40 0.4× 139 1.7× 31 0.4× 67 0.9× 48 546
Emily M. Hayden United States 16 398 2.0× 77 0.8× 157 1.9× 82 1.1× 281 3.9× 55 710
Scott Graziano United States 14 253 1.2× 177 1.8× 122 1.5× 24 0.3× 67 0.9× 45 637
John A. Dent United Kingdom 12 387 1.9× 152 1.6× 155 1.9× 165 2.2× 99 1.4× 27 637
Aussama K. Nassar United States 13 167 0.8× 159 1.6× 109 1.3× 21 0.3× 41 0.6× 39 667
Brittany Star Hampton United States 13 184 0.9× 306 3.1× 90 1.1× 21 0.3× 56 0.8× 43 661

Countries citing papers authored by James J. Neutens

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James J. Neutens's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James J. Neutens with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James J. Neutens more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James J. Neutens

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James J. Neutens. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James J. Neutens. The network helps show where James J. Neutens may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of James J. Neutens

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James J. Neutens. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James J. Neutens based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James J. Neutens. James J. Neutens is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
1.
Brown, Kathleen C., et al.. (2009). Screening Mammography Utilization in Tennessee Women: The Association With Residence. The Journal of Rural Health. 25(2). 167–173. 9 indexed citations
2.
Casey, Petra M., Alice R. Goepfert, Eve Espey, et al.. (2009). To the point: reviews in medical education—the Objective Structured Clinical Examination. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 200(1). 25–34. 65 indexed citations
3.
Metheny, William P., Susan M. Cox, Alice R. Goepfert, et al.. (2009). A Comprehensive Review to Establish Priority Learning Objectives for Medical Students in the Obstetrics and Gynecology Clerkship. Obstetric Anesthesia Digest. 29(3). 113–114. 1 indexed citations
4.
Metheny, William P., Susan M. Cox, Jessica L. Bienstock, et al.. (2008). A comprehensive review to establish priority learning objectives for medical students in the obstetrics and gynecology clerkship. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 199(5). 563.e1–563.e9. 4 indexed citations
5.
Hammoud, Maya M., Francis S. Nuthalapaty, Alice R. Goepfert, et al.. (2008). To the point: medical education review of the role of simulators in surgical training. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 199(4). 338–343. 89 indexed citations
6.
Espey, Eve, Francis S. Nuthalapaty, Sue Ellen Cox, et al.. (2007). To the point: medical education review of the RIME method for the evaluation of medical student clinical performance. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 197(2). 123–133. 13 indexed citations
7.
Hicks, Patricia J., Susan M. Cox, Eve Espey, et al.. (2005). To the point: Medical education reviews—Dealing with student difficulties in the clinical setting. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 193(6). 1915–1922. 38 indexed citations
8.
Metheny, William P., Eve Espey, Jessica L. Bienstock, et al.. (2005). To the point: Medical education reviews evaluation in context: Assessing learners, teachers, and training programs. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 192(1). 34–37. 18 indexed citations
9.
Krueger, Paul M., James J. Neutens, Jessica L. Bienstock, et al.. (2004). To the point: reviews in medical education teaching techniques. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 191(2). 408–411. 13 indexed citations
10.
Caudle, Michael R., Mark A. Clapp, Diane Stockton, & James J. Neutens. (1995). Advanced obstetrical training for family physicians: the future hope for rural obstetrical care.. PubMed. 41(2). 123–5. 6 indexed citations
11.
Neutens, James J.. (1992). Sexuality Education in Comprehensive School Health Programs: Surviving the “Moral Smog”. Journal of School Health. 62(2). 74–75. 3 indexed citations
12.
McDonald, Thomas W., et al.. (1989). Impact of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia diagnosis and treatment on self-esteem and body image. Gynecologic Oncology. 34(3). 345–349. 67 indexed citations
13.
Neutens, James J. & Laurna Rubinson. (1987). Research techniques for the health sciences. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 123 indexed citations
14.
Neutens, James J., et al.. (1986). Can Microcomputers Identify Differences in Health Status between Different Groups?. Health Education. 17(2). 37–42. 2 indexed citations
15.
Neutens, James J., et al.. (1985). A Comparison of Two HRAs for Use in the University Classroom. Journal of School Health. 55(10). 413–417. 2 indexed citations
16.
Neutens, James J. & Michael L. Jackson. (1984). Ethics of the Health Educator as Behavior Change Agent in Gerontological Health. Health Education. 15(7). 45–48. 1 indexed citations
17.
Neutens, James J., et al.. (1980). Contraceptive Attitudes and Practices. Health Education. 11(5). 39–41. 3 indexed citations
18.
Neutens, James J., et al.. (1979). An Instrument to Appraise Attitudes of College Students Toward Euthanasia. Journal of School Health. 49(6). 351–352. 25 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026