James I. Porter

2.5k citations
64 papers · 476 indexed · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

    • Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel 10
    • Classical Philosophy and Thought 8
    • Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism 5
    • Classical Antiquity Studies 16

James I. Porter

44 papers receiving 355 citations

Peers

James I. Porter
Comparison fields: 5 of 105
  • Anthropology 127
  • Music 34
  • Classics 37
  • Philosophy 100
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 33
Replace Christiane L. Joost‐Gaugier with:
Christiane L. Joost‐Gaugier United States
N. G. Wilson United States
Don Fowler South Korea
Jill Kraye United States
John Ferguson United States
Eugenio Garin Italy
Alberto Maria Ghisalberti
Marc Baer United States
Ralph Cohen Brazil
Nadia Tazi France
James I. Porter relative to Christiane L. Joost‐Gaugier United States Christiane L. Joost‐Gaugier's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×27×
Christiane L. Joost‐Gaugier · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James I. Porter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James I. Porter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James I. Porter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James I. Porter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James I. Porter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James I. Porter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James I. Porter. The network helps show where James I. Porter may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James I. Porter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James I. Porter Line = papers co-authored together James I. Porter links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20250
2 20250
3 20240
4 20230
5 202325
6 20179
7 20172
8 20150
9 20105
10 20100
11
Classical pasts : the classical traditions of Greece and Rome
200622
12
What is “Classical” about Classical Antiquity? Eight Propositions
200511
13 200311
14
L'antico degli antichi
20030
15 20010
16 200113
17 200132
18 19972
19 199471
20 19889

About James I. Porter

James I. Porter is a scholar working on Philosophy, Anthropology, Classics, General Arts and Humanities and Archeology, having authored 64 papers that have together received 476 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Classical Antiquity Studies (16 papers), Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel (10 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (8 papers), Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (6 papers), Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism (5 papers), Byzantine Studies and History (4 papers), German Literature and Culture Studies (3 papers) and Critical Theory and Political Philosophy (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anthropology (127 citations), Music (34 citations), Classics (37 citations), Philosophy (100 citations) and Visual Arts and Performing Arts (33 citations). James I. Porter has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Robert A. Branch, G. Wilkinson, Chris Goertzen, Timothy Rice, Dalia Judovitz, Alan D. Schrift, Vipul Patel, Márcio Covas Moschovas, Joseph H. Connell and Harold S. Powers. Their work appears in journals such as Classical Antiquity, Foucault Studies, Critical Inquiry, The British Journal of Aesthetics and Ethnomusicology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026