James Howie

1.4k citations
72 papers · 676 indexed · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

James Howie

62 papers receiving 583 citations

Peers

James Howie
Comparison fields: 5 of 38
  • Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics 225
  • Geometry and Topology 561
  • Mathematical Physics 371
  • Algebra and Number Theory 72
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 191
Replace M. J. Dunwoody with:
M. J. Dunwoody United Kingdom
Luis Paris France
Hamish Short France
Daniel E. Cohen United Kingdom
Eliyahu Rips Israel
Ruth Charney United States
Alexander I. Suciu United States
Ralph Strebel Germany
A. Yu. Olshanskii Russia
Zlil Sela Israel
James Howie relative to M. J. Dunwoody United Kingdom M. J. Dunwoody's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.7×
M. J. Dunwoody · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James Howie

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Howie's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Howie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Howie more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Howie

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Howie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Howie. The network helps show where James Howie may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 15 scholars most cited alongside James Howie, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James Howie Line = papers co-authored together James Howie links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 201327
2 201210
3 20101
4 20075
5 20064
6
SOME RESULTS ON ONE-RELATOR SURFACE GROUPS
20047
7 20029
8 20006
9 19981
10 199112
11 19918
12 19899
13 198823
14 19887
15 19880
16 198811
17 19880
18 19874
19 198320
20
Pullback functors and crossed complexes
197913

About James Howie

James Howie is a scholar working on Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics, Geometry and Topology, Mathematical Physics, Algebra and Number Theory and Computational Theory and Mathematics, having authored 72 papers that have together received 676 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geometric and Algebraic Topology (37 papers), Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology (20 papers), Finite Group Theory Research (19 papers), semigroups and automata theory (10 papers), Advanced Topology and Set Theory (10 papers), Advanced Operator Algebra Research (10 papers), Advanced Topics in Algebra (8 papers) and Rings, Modules, and Algebras (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics (225 citations), Geometry and Topology (561 citations), Mathematical Physics (371 citations), Algebra and Number Theory (72 citations) and Computational Theory and Mathematics (191 citations). James Howie has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, France and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Martin R. Bridson, Hamish Short, Martin Edjvet, Andrew J. Duncan, Charles F. Miller, Gerhard Rosenberger, Benjamin Fine, Stephen J. Pride, N. D. Gilbert and Natalia Kopteva. Their work appears in journals such as Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society, Journal of Pure and Applied Algebra, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society and Journal of the London Mathematical Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026