James Hook

579 citations
20 papers · 317 indexed · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

    • Security and Verification in Computing 5
    • Logic, programming, and type systems 5
    • Software Reliability and Analysis Research 3

James Hook

18 papers receiving 278 citations

Peers

James Hook
Comparison fields: 5 of 41
  • Software 113
  • Hardware and Architecture 77
  • Artificial Intelligence 228
  • Information Systems 111
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 70
Replace Jukka Paakki with:
Jukka Paakki Finland
Patrick Borras France
Kevin Bierhoff United States
M.C.J.D. van Eekelen Netherlands
Ira R. Forman United States
Yaniv Eytani Israel
Jay McCarthy United States
R. E. Kurt Stirewalt United States
Nikolaos Papaspyrou Greece
Susan Eisenbach United Kingdom
James Hook relative to Jukka Paakki Finland Jukka Paakki's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Jukka Paakki · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James Hook

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Hook's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Hook with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Hook more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Hook

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Hook. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Hook. The network helps show where James Hook may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James Hook, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James Hook Line = papers co-authored together James Hook links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 199692
2 199732
3 199331
4 200230
5 199428
6 199427
7 200518
8 199716
9 202014
10
Impredicative Strong Existential Equivalent to Type:Type
198610
11
An Overview of the Programatica Toolset
20047
12 20242
13 20242
14 20092
15 20022
16
Multi-Age Grouping: The One Room School Revisited?.
19961
17
Haskell as an Automation Controller
19991
18
Domain Separation by Construction
20031
19 20031
20 20030

About James Hook

James Hook is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Software, Computer Networks and Communications, Information Systems and Computational Theory and Mathematics, having authored 20 papers that have together received 317 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Security and Verification in Computing (5 papers), Logic, programming, and type systems (5 papers), Software Engineering Research (4 papers), Formal Methods in Verification (4 papers), Software Reliability and Analysis Research (3 papers), Software Engineering Techniques and Practices (3 papers), Advanced Malware Detection Techniques (3 papers) and Distributed systems and fault tolerance (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Software (113 citations), Hardware and Architecture (77 citations), Artificial Intelligence (228 citations), Information Systems (111 citations) and Computational Theory and Mathematics (70 citations). James Hook has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Jeffrey Bell, Richard B. Kieburtz, Dino P. Oliva, Tim Sheard, Jeffrey R. Lewis, Michael Wolfe, Harini Srinivasan, Ira Smith, Douglas J. Howe and Joanna Goode. Their work appears in journals such as ACM SIGPLAN Notices, Science of Computer Programming, Journal of Computer Security, Frontiers in Education and Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact