James H. Chandler
- Biomedical Engineering top 5%
- Condensed Matter Physics top 5%
- Mechanical Engineering top 10%
- Control and Systems Engineering top 10%
- Surgery
- Co-authors
- Pietro ValdastriPeter LloydGiovanni PittiglioTomás da VeigaRussell A. HarrisKeith L. ObsteinAli Kafash HoshiarOnaizah Onaizah
- Topics
- Soft Robotics and Applications (36 papers)Micro and Nano Robotics (26 papers)Modular Robots and Swarm Intelligence (9 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaGastroenterologyScientific Reports
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesNetherlands
In The Last Decade
James H. Chandler
52 papers receiving 932 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
- Biomedical Engineering 731
- Condensed Matter Physics 401
- Mechanical Engineering 325
- Control and Systems Engineering 136
- Surgery 95
Countries citing papers authored by James H. Chandler
This map shows the geographic impact of James H. Chandler's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James H. Chandler with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James H. Chandler more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James H. Chandler
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James H. Chandler. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James H. Chandler. The network helps show where James H. Chandler may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of James H. Chandler
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James H. Chandler. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James H. Chandler based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James H. Chandler. James H. Chandler is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 5 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 9 | |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 5 | |
| 10 | 29 | |
| 11 | 20 | |
| 12 | 21 | |
| 13 | 14 | |
| 14 | 16 | |
| 15 | 21 | |
| 16 | 35 | |
| 17 | 86 | |
| 18 | 9 | |
| 19 | 19 | |
| 20 | 71 |
About James H. Chandler
James H. Chandler is a scholar working on Condensed Matter Physics, Biomedical Engineering and Health Informatics, having authored 58 papers that have together received 951 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Soft Robotics and Applications (36 papers), Micro and Nano Robotics (26 papers) and Modular Robots and Swarm Intelligence (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Condensed Matter Physics (401 citations), Biomedical Engineering (731 citations) and Mechanical Engineering (325 citations). James H. Chandler has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Pietro Valdastri, Peter Lloyd, Giovanni Pittiglio, Tomás da Veiga, Russell A. Harris, Keith L. Obstein, Ali Kafash Hoshiar, Onaizah Onaizah, Nathan J. Wilkinson and George W. Kabalka. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Gastroenterology and Scientific Reports.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.