James Geer

1.3k citations
70 papers · 938 · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

James Geer

70 papers receiving 814 citations

Peers

James Geer
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
  • Numerical Analysis 114
  • Modeling and Simulation 67
  • Computational Mechanics 273
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 124
  • Applied Mathematics 67
Replace Xiu Yang with:
Xiu Yang United States
S. M. Roberts United States
Zabidin Salleh Malaysia
Chieh‐Sen Huang Taiwan
Robert M. M. Mattheij Netherlands
A. Charafi United Kingdom
Karel Rektorys Czechia
J. S. Shipman United States
Prem K. Kythe United States
K. Sobczyk Poland
James Geer relative to Xiu Yang United States Xiu Yang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Xiu Yang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James Geer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Geer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Geer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Geer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Geer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Geer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Geer. The network helps show where James Geer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside James Geer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James Geer Line = papers co-authored together James Geer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 70 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198271
2 199261
3 198461
4 201548
5 200033
6 200729
7 199728
8 197328
9 201426
10 199525
11 198325
12 197525
13 197624
14 201423
15 201123
16 201418
17 196818
18 198918
19 197815
20 199015

About James Geer

James Geer is a scholar working on Computational Mechanics, Mechanical Engineering, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Numerical Analysis and Materials Chemistry, having authored 70 papers that have together received 938 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Heat Transfer and Optimization (16 papers), Heat Transfer and Boiling Studies (12 papers), Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows (11 papers), Fluid Dynamics and Vibration Analysis (9 papers), Thermal properties of materials (8 papers), Experimental and Theoretical Physics Studies (7 papers), Differential Equations and Numerical Methods (7 papers) and Scientific Research and Discoveries (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Numerical Analysis (114 citations), Modeling and Simulation (67 citations), Computational Mechanics (273 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (124 citations) and Applied Mathematics (67 citations). James Geer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Romania. Frequent co-authors include C. M. Andersen, Bahgat Sammakia, Tianyi Gao, George J. Klir, Joseph B. Keller, John C. Strikwerda, Roger Schmidt, Timothy J. Singler, Milnes P. David and Bruce T. Murray. Their work appears in journals such as SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics, Journal of Fluid Mechanics, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, Journal of Scientific Computing and Journal of Electronic Packaging.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact