James Field

57 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

James Field
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
  • General Dentistry 535
  • Orthodontics 153
  • Periodontics 132
  • Oral Surgery 165
  • Family Practice 36
Replace Sharon K. Lanning with:
Sharon K. Lanning United States
Michael Manogue United Kingdom
Anders Nattestad Denmark
Johanna M. Vervoorn Netherlands
Hawazin W. Elani United States
Marsha A. Pyle United States
Keith Mays United States
Ana Estela Haddad Brazil
A. S. M. Gilmour United Kingdom
Francis Burke Ireland
James Field relative to Sharon K. Lanning United States Sharon K. Lanning's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.5×
Sharon K. Lanning · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James Field

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Field's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Field with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Field more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Field

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Field. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Field. The network helps show where James Field may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James Field, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James Field Line = papers co-authored together James Field links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 59 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2020161
2 2017151
3 201098
4 201993
5 201747
6 202039
7 201735
8 202231
9 202031
10 202127
11 201726
12 201722
13 201722
14 202018
15 202017
16 201017
17 201316
18 202413
19 200913
20 201713

About James Field

James Field is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions, General Dentistry, Periodontics and Orthodontics, having authored 59 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovations in Medical Education (25 papers), Dental Education, Practice, Research (22 papers), Dental Research and COVID-19 (22 papers), Dental Health and Care Utilization (9 papers), Dental materials and restorations (8 papers), Dental Erosion and Treatment (6 papers), Radiology practices and education (4 papers) and Empathy and Medical Education (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Dentistry (535 citations), Orthodontics (153 citations), Periodontics (132 citations), Oral Surgery (165 citations) and Family Practice (36 citations). James Field has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Sweden and France. Frequent co-authors include A. D. Walmsley, J. G. Cowpe, Matthew J. German, Paula Waterhouse, Nicolás Martín, Jonathan Dixon, María Cristina Manzanares‐Céspedes, Julia R. Davies, Sibylle Vital and Corrado Paganelli. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal Of Dental Education, BDJ, Journal of Dentistry, Journal of Dental Education and European Journal of Public Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact