James F. Fraser
- Surgery top 10%
- Biomedical Engineering
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
- Epidemiology
- Economics and Econometrics
- Co-authors
- Mark J. SpangehlJonathan R. DanoffJoshua W. HustedtDaniel D. BohlWilliam J. HozackJorge ManriqueMichael ReynoldsDavid Jacofsky
- Topics
- Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes (9 papers)Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty (8 papers)Orthopedic Infections and Treatments (6 papers)
- Journals
- Clinical Orthopaedics and Related ResearchThe Journal of ArthroplastyJournal of Visualized Experiments
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomAustralia
In The Last Decade
James F. Fraser
19 papers receiving 340 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
- Surgery 299
- Biomedical Engineering 37
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 33
- Epidemiology 23
- Economics and Econometrics 19
Countries citing papers authored by James F. Fraser
This map shows the geographic impact of James F. Fraser's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James F. Fraser with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James F. Fraser more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James F. Fraser
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James F. Fraser. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James F. Fraser. The network helps show where James F. Fraser may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of James F. Fraser
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James F. Fraser. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James F. Fraser based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James F. Fraser. James F. Fraser is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 52 | |
| 2 | 32 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 7 | |
| 7 | 88 | |
| 8 | 53 | |
| 9 | 8 | |
| 10 | 31 | |
| 11 | 26 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 2 | |
| 14 | 12 | |
| 15 | 11 | |
| 16 | Knee and hip joint replacements. Longer lasting prostheses. | 3 |
| 17 | 10 | |
| 18 | 5 | |
| 19 | 6 |
About James F. Fraser
James F. Fraser is a scholar working on Small Animals, Surgery and Agronomy and Crop Science, having authored 19 papers that have together received 353 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes (9 papers), Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty (8 papers) and Orthopedic Infections and Treatments (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Surgery (299 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (15 citations) and Internal Medicine (8 citations). James F. Fraser has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Mark J. Spangehl, Jonathan R. Danoff, Joshua W. Hustedt, Daniel D. Bohl, William J. Hozack, Jorge Manrique, Michael Reynolds, David Jacofsky, Peter F. Sharkey and Simon W. Young. Their work appears in journals such as Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, The Journal of Arthroplasty and Journal of Visualized Experiments.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.