Peter F. Sharkey
- Surgery top 0.1%
- Biomedical Engineering top 5%
- Orthopedics and Sports Medicine top 1%
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine top 5%
- Rheumatology top 5%
- Co-authors
- Javad ParviziWilliam J. HozackRichard H. RothmanShani ShastriJames J. PurtillSidney M. JacobyPaul M. LichsteinChao Shen
- Topics
- Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes (125 papers)Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty (124 papers)Orthopedic Infections and Treatments (96 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Bone and Joint SurgeryThe American Journal of Sports MedicineClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomFrance
In The Last Decade
Peter F. Sharkey
167 papers receiving 9.1k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 150
- Surgery 8.4k
- Biomedical Engineering 737
- Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 603
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 403
- Rheumatology 342
Countries citing papers authored by Peter F. Sharkey
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter F. Sharkey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter F. Sharkey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter F. Sharkey more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Peter F. Sharkey
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter F. Sharkey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter F. Sharkey. The network helps show where Peter F. Sharkey may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Peter F. Sharkey
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Peter F. Sharkey. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Peter F. Sharkey based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Peter F. Sharkey. Peter F. Sharkey is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 15 | |
| 2 | 61 | |
| 3 | 20 | |
| 4 | 70 | |
| 5 | 50 | |
| 6 | 30 | |
| 7 | 25 | |
| 8 | 45 | |
| 9 | 199 | |
| 10 | 16 | |
| 11 | 48 | |
| 12 | 30 | |
| 13 | 124 | |
| 14 | 92 | |
| 15 | 64 | |
| 16 | 124 | |
| 17 | Why Are Total Knee Arthroplasties Failing Today?breakdown → | 1024 |
| 18 | 123 | |
| 19 | 96 | |
| 20 | 26 |
About Peter F. Sharkey
Peter F. Sharkey is a scholar working on Surgery, Internal Medicine and Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, having authored 170 papers that have together received 9.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes (125 papers), Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty (124 papers) and Orthopedic Infections and Treatments (96 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Surgery (8.4k citations), Internal Medicine (268 citations) and Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (603 citations). Peter F. Sharkey has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and France. Frequent co-authors include Javad Parvizi, William J. Hozack, Richard H. Rothman, Shani Shastri, James J. Purtill, Sidney M. Jacoby, Paul M. Lichstein, Chao Shen, Anthony T. Tokarski and Robert L. Barrack. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, The American Journal of Sports Medicine and Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.