James E. Dittes

862 citations
39 papers · 605 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

    • Religion, Society, and Development 5
    • Religion and Society Interactions 4
    • Theological Perspectives and Practices 2
    • Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology 6

James E. Dittes

34 papers receiving 429 citations

Peers

James E. Dittes
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • General Psychology 24
  • Health 147
  • Applied Psychology 60
  • Social Psychology 176
  • Sociology and Political Science 284
Replace Bonnel Klentz with:
Bonnel Klentz United States
Sandra S. Tangri United States
Dorothy Willner United States
Richard Ofshe United States
Ernest Becker United States
Leonard Solomon United States
Anne Geyer United States
Irving Sarnoff United States
Michele A. Paludi United States
Donald B. Meyer United States
James E. Dittes relative to Bonnel Klentz United States Bonnel Klentz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Bonnel Klentz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James E. Dittes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James E. Dittes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James E. Dittes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James E. Dittes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James E. Dittes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James E. Dittes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James E. Dittes. The network helps show where James E. Dittes may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside James E. Dittes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James E. Dittes Line = papers co-authored together James E. Dittes links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 39 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1956131
2 195981
3 196255
4 197146
5 195739
6 196531
7 198327
8 196621
9 195920
10 196119
11 195717
12 196516
13 199112
14 196211
15 196910
16 19739
17 19698
18
Re-Calling Ministry
19997
19 19716
20 19865

About James E. Dittes

James E. Dittes is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Health, Philosophy, Archeology and Social Psychology, having authored 39 papers that have together received 605 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (6 papers), Religion, Society, and Development (5 papers), Religion and Society Interactions (4 papers), Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (4 papers), Augustinian Studies and Theology (4 papers), Byzantine Studies and History (2 papers), Theological Perspectives and Practices (2 papers) and Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Psychology (24 citations), Health (147 citations), Applied Psychology (60 citations), Social Psychology (176 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (284 citations). James E. Dittes has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Harold H. Kelley, Harry F. Gollob, Donald Capps, Robert J. Menges, W. J. M. Douglas, Pierre Hégy, Robert H. Thouless, Harold McCurdy, Stanley Schachter and W. W. Meissner. Their work appears in journals such as Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, Review of Religious Research, Pastoral Psychology, Interpretation A Journal of Bible and Theology and Journal of the American Academy of Religion.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact