James Davies
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 10%
- Pharmacology top 10%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 10%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Co-authors
- John ReadTodd C. RaeMichael P. HengartnerRosemary RizqA. McD. MercerNeşe DevenotRichard C. D. BrownJoanna Moncrieff
- Topics
- Wind and Air Flow Studies (5 papers)Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies (4 papers)Treatment of Major Depression (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesSwitzerland
In The Last Decade
James Davies
33 papers receiving 594 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 132
- Psychiatry and Mental health 160
- Pharmacology 159
- Clinical Psychology 146
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 114
- Social Psychology 107
Countries citing papers authored by James Davies
This map shows the geographic impact of James Davies's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Davies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Davies more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James Davies
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Davies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Davies. The network helps show where James Davies may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of James Davies
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James Davies. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James Davies based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James Davies. James Davies is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 7 | |
| 5 | 7 | |
| 6 | 7 | |
| 7 | 4 | |
| 8 | 28 | |
| 9 | 230 | |
| 10 | The Sedated Society: the causes and harms of our psychiatric prescribing epidemic | 1 |
| 11 | 13 | |
| 12 | 5 | |
| 13 | Cracked : why psychiatry is doing more harm than good | 24 |
| 14 | Emotions in the Field: The Psychology and Anthropology of Fieldwork Experience | 52 |
| 15 | The Works Of Hesiod, Callimachus And Theognis | 0 |
| 16 | 9 | |
| 17 | 3 | |
| 18 | 7 | |
| 19 | 5 | |
| 20 | 2 |
About James Davies
James Davies is a scholar working on General Psychology, Geriatrics and Gerontology and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 40 papers that have together received 647 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Wind and Air Flow Studies (5 papers), Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies (4 papers) and Treatment of Major Depression (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (160 citations), Biological Psychiatry (25 citations) and Pharmacology (159 citations). James Davies has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include John Read, Todd C. Rae, Michael P. Hengartner, Rosemary Rizq, A. McD. Mercer, Neşe Devenot, Richard C. D. Brown, Joanna Moncrieff, Ruth Cooper and D.J. Hall. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Journal of Hazardous Materials and Psychological Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.