Caroline Bradley
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 2%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Philosophy top 2%
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Economics and Econometrics top 10%
- Co-authors
- Max MarshallAustin LockwoodMark FentonClive E AdamsDaniel MichelsonJohn F. McGowanA. Michael FroomkinAmanda C de C Williams
- Topics
- Homelessness and Social Issues (3 papers)Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (2 papers)Pathogenesis and Treatment of Hiccups (2 papers)
- Journals
- Cochrane Database of Systematic ReviewsThe British Journal of PsychiatryClinical Child and Family Psychology Review
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Caroline Bradley
14 papers receiving 804 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 111
- Psychiatry and Mental health 462
- Clinical Psychology 247
- Philosophy 131
- General Health Professions 94
- Economics and Econometrics 88
Countries citing papers authored by Caroline Bradley
This map shows the geographic impact of Caroline Bradley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Caroline Bradley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Caroline Bradley more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Caroline Bradley
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Caroline Bradley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Caroline Bradley. The network helps show where Caroline Bradley may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Caroline Bradley
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Caroline Bradley. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Caroline Bradley based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Caroline Bradley. Caroline Bradley is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 8 | |
| 3 | 34 | |
| 4 | 14 | |
| 5 | 34 | |
| 6 | 58 | |
| 7 | 7 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | Virtual Worlds, Real Rules | 20 |
| 10 | Unpublished rating scales: A major source of bias in randomised controlled trials of treatments for schizophreniabreakdown → | 617 |
| 11 | 0 | |
| 12 | 5 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 19 | |
| 15 | 13 |
About Caroline Bradley
Caroline Bradley is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Clinical Psychology and General Health Professions, having authored 15 papers that have together received 832 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Homelessness and Social Issues (3 papers), Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (2 papers) and Pathogenesis and Treatment of Hiccups (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (462 citations), Philosophy (131 citations) and Clinical Psychology (247 citations). Caroline Bradley has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Max Marshall, Austin Lockwood, Mark Fenton, Clive E Adams, Daniel Michelson, John F. McGowan, A. Michael Froomkin, Amanda C de C Williams, Aneesha Singh and Nadia Bianchi‐Berthouze. Their work appears in journals such as Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, The British Journal of Psychiatry and Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.