James D. Lewis
- Molecular Biology top 0.2%
- Epidemiology top 0.05%
- Genetics top 0.05%
- Surgery top 0.2%
- Infectious Diseases top 0.2%
- Co-authors
- Gary D. WuFrederic D. BushmanHongzhe LiKyle BittingerLisa NesselGary R. LichtensteinChristian HoffmannMeenakshi Bewtra
- Topics
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease (189 papers)Microscopic Colitis (136 papers)Gut microbiota and health (33 papers)
- Cited by
- GastroenterologyGeneticsHepatology
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
James D. Lewis
491 papers receiving 32.4k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 204
- Molecular Biology 11.2k
- Epidemiology 9.3k
- Genetics 9.0k
- Surgery 6.6k
- Infectious Diseases 4.1k
Countries citing papers authored by James D. Lewis
This map shows the geographic impact of James D. Lewis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James D. Lewis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James D. Lewis more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James D. Lewis
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James D. Lewis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James D. Lewis. The network helps show where James D. Lewis may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of James D. Lewis
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James D. Lewis. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James D. Lewis based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James D. Lewis. James D. Lewis is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 23 | |
| 5 | 10 | |
| 6 | 7 | |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | 14 | |
| 9 | 8 | |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | 35 | |
| 12 | 178 | |
| 13 | 17 | |
| 14 | 2 | |
| 15 | 60 | |
| 16 | ACA-mandated elimination of cost sharing for preventive screening has had limited early impact. | 43 |
| 17 | 2 | |
| 18 | 66 | |
| 19 | Proceedings of the BIRS workshop on Calabi-Yau varieties and mirror symmetry, December 6-11, 2003, Banff International Research Station for Mathematics Innovation & Discovery | 0 |
| 20 | Colorectal cancer screening with sigmoidoscopy: primary care issues. | 1 |
About James D. Lewis
James D. Lewis is a scholar working on Gastroenterology, Genetics and Epidemiology, having authored 518 papers that have together received 33.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Inflammatory Bowel Disease (189 papers), Microscopic Colitis (136 papers) and Gut microbiota and health (33 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gastroenterology (3.0k citations), Genetics (9.0k citations) and Hepatology (2.2k citations). James D. Lewis has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Gary D. Wu, Frederic D. Bushman, Hongzhe Li, Kyle Bittinger, Lisa Nessel, Gary R. Lichtenstein, Christian Hoffmann, Meenakshi Bewtra, Yu‐Xiao Yang and Colleen Brensinger. Their work appears in journals such as Science, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and The Lancet.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.