James D. Doorley

36 papers receiving 730 citations

Peers

James D. Doorley
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
  • Research and Theory 21
  • Applied Psychology 76
  • Clinical Psychology 318
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 125
  • Social Psychology 196
Replace Gloria García‐Banda with:
Gloria García‐Banda Spain
John J. McGovern United Kingdom
J. Graham Jones United Kingdom
Michael de Vibe Norway
Ralph E. Schmidt Switzerland
Olivia Metcalf Australia
Keith A. Nichols United Kingdom
Alissa Beath Australia
James Bunde United States
Guadalupe Molinari Spain
James D. Doorley relative to Gloria García‐Banda Spain Gloria García‐Banda's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×5.7×
Gloria García‐Banda · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James D. Doorley

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James D. Doorley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James D. Doorley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James D. Doorley more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James D. Doorley

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James D. Doorley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James D. Doorley. The network helps show where James D. Doorley may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James D. Doorley, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James D. Doorley Line = papers co-authored together James D. Doorley links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2020173
2 2020167
3
The preceptor experience: a qualitative study of perceptions of nurse preceptors regarding the preceptor role.
199534
4 202133
5 202132
6 202126
7 201722
8 201517
9 202117
10 201616
11 202116
12 202015
13 201914
14 202214
15 201313
16 202013
17 202011
18 202311
19 202110
20 202110

About James D. Doorley

James D. Doorley is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Pharmacology, Social Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health and General Health Professions, having authored 38 papers that have together received 746 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions (5 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (4 papers), Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (3 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (3 papers), Grit, Self-Efficacy, and Motivation (2 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (2 papers), Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (2 papers) and Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (21 citations), Applied Psychology (76 citations), Clinical Psychology (318 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (125 citations) and Social Psychology (196 citations). James D. Doorley has collaborated with scholars based in United States and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include Todd B. Kashdan, Fallon Rachael Goodman, Kerry C. Kelso, David J. Disabato, Patrick E. McKnight, Ana‐Maria Vranceanu, Jafar Bakhshaie, Christianne L. Esposito-Smythers, Ryan A. Mace and Barbara J. Stevenson. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neuro-Oncology, Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, Journal of Affective Disorders, American Journal on Addictions and Journal of Psychiatric Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact