James Currie

974 citations
22 papers · 706 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

James Currie

22 papers receiving 691 citations

Peers

James Currie
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 243
  • Neurology 125
  • Pharmacology 209
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 44
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 221
Replace Klaus-Peter Kühl with:
Klaus-Peter Kühl Germany
Peter K. Thanos United States
Victoria Di Sclafani United States
Lauren Nutile United States
Dhruman D. Goradia United States
Ricardo Guarnieri Brazil
Lihua Xue United States
Silvia Rigucci Italy
Jaana Föhr Finland
Trisha Chakrabarty Canada
James Currie relative to Klaus-Peter Kühl Germany Klaus-Peter Kühl's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.5×
Klaus-Peter Kühl · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James Currie

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Currie's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Currie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Currie more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Currie

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Currie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Currie. The network helps show where James Currie may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James Currie, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James Currie Line = papers co-authored together James Currie links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012172
2 2001117
3 200670
4 199161
5 201457
6 201742
7 201533
8 199426
9 201224
10 199224
11
Cervical ripening and labor induction with intracervical triacetin base prostaglandin E2 gel: a placebo-controlled study.
198424
12 200714
13 201710
14 20227
15 20165
16 20224
17
Responses of magnocellular neurons to osmotic stimulation involves coactivation of excitatory and inhibitory input
20013
18 20223
19 19923
20 20243

About James Currie

James Currie is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Molecular Biology, Pharmacology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Surgery, having authored 22 papers that have together received 706 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies (7 papers), Treatment of Major Depression (5 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (3 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (3 papers), Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies (2 papers), Neurological disorders and treatments (2 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (2 papers) and Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (243 citations), Neurology (125 citations), Pharmacology (209 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (44 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (221 citations). James Currie has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Qatar and United States. Frequent co-authors include Ian Reid, Jennifer S. Perrin, Daniel Bennett, J. Douglas Steele, Christian Schwarzbauer, Stephen M. Lawrie, Gordon Fernie, R. D. Rudelli, David C. Bolton and Paul E. Bendheim. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Ect, Journal of Neuroscience, Journal of Affective Disorders, Brain Research and Scientific Reports.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact