Trisha Chakrabarty

1.5k citations
46 papers · 550 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Trisha Chakrabarty

43 papers receiving 541 citations

Peers

Trisha Chakrabarty
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
  • Biological Psychiatry 51
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 225
  • Pharmacology 93
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 34
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 18
Replace Marie‐Josée Filteau with:
Marie‐Josée Filteau Canada
T. Acciavatti Italy
Helle K. Schoeyen Norway
Harlyn Aizley United States
Silvia Rigucci Italy
Marta Cano Spain
Ciro Marangoni United States
Claire Donaghey United Kingdom
Nick J. Coupland Canada
Xiangyang Zhang China
Trisha Chakrabarty relative to Marie‐Josée Filteau Canada Marie‐Josée Filteau's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.1×
Marie‐Josée Filteau · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Trisha Chakrabarty

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Trisha Chakrabarty's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Trisha Chakrabarty with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Trisha Chakrabarty more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Trisha Chakrabarty

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Trisha Chakrabarty. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Trisha Chakrabarty. The network helps show where Trisha Chakrabarty may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Trisha Chakrabarty, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Trisha Chakrabarty Line = papers co-authored together Trisha Chakrabarty links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 46 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201652
2 202145
3 201943
4 202134
5 201529
6 201828
7 201925
8 201924
9 202020
10 202220
11 201920
12 201918
13 202016
14 201913
15 201513
16 202312
17 201711
18 201610
19 202110
20 20209

About Trisha Chakrabarty

Trisha Chakrabarty is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Pharmacology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Clinical Psychology, having authored 46 papers that have together received 550 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (21 papers), Treatment of Major Depression (9 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (5 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (4 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (3 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (3 papers), Circadian rhythm and melatonin (2 papers) and Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (51 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (225 citations), Pharmacology (93 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (34 citations) and Behavioral Neuroscience (18 citations). Trisha Chakrabarty has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include Lakshmi N. Yatham, Raymond W. Lam, Kamyar Keramatian, Ivan J. Torres, Gayatri Saraf, George Hadjipavlou, Erin E. Michalak, Jairo Vinícius Pinto, Amir A. Sepehry and Ging‐Yuek Robin Hsiung. Their work appears in journals such as The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, Journal of Affective Disorders, CNS Drugs, Bipolar Disorders and eNeuro.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact