Philip M. Bull
-
- Neuroscience of respiration and sleep 9
- Regulation of Appetite and Obesity 4
- Behavioral Neuroscience top 2%
- Stress Responses and Cortisol 5
- Social Psychology top 1%
- Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior 19
- Pharmacy top 2%
-
- Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology 6
- Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research 3
-
- Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling 6
-
- Growth Hormone and Insulin-like Growth Factors 3
- Co-authors
- Gareth LengMike LudwigGovindan DayanithiNancy SabatierRainer LandgrafAlison J. DouglasJohn A. RussellColin H. Brown
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesGermany
In The Last Decade
Philip M. Bull
25 papers receiving 1.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
- Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 750
- Behavioral Neuroscience 230
- Social Psychology 933
- Pharmacy 138
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 359
Countries citing papers authored by Philip M. Bull
This map shows the geographic impact of Philip M. Bull's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip M. Bull with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip M. Bull more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Philip M. Bull
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip M. Bull. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip M. Bull. The network helps show where Philip M. Bull may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Philip M. Bull, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2011 | 9 | |
| 2 | 2009 | 12 | |
| 3 | 2006 | 79 | |
| 4 | 2006 | 19 | |
| 5 | 2005 | 91 | |
| 6 | 2004 | 35 | |
| 7 | 2004 | 24 | |
| 8 | 2004 | 41 | |
| 9 | 2004 | 20 | |
| 10 | 2003 | 11 | |
| 11 | 2003 | 162 | |
| 12 | 2002 | 267 | |
| 13 | Responses of magnocellular neurons to osmotic stimulation involves coactivation of excitatory and inhibitory input | 2001 | 3 |
| 14 | 2001 | 117 | |
| 15 | 2000 | 62 | |
| 16 | 1999 | 21 | |
| 17 | 1999 | 32 | |
| 18 | 1998 | 32 | |
| 19 | 1994 | 18 | |
| 20 | 1993 | 19 |
About Philip M. Bull
Philip M. Bull is a scholar working on Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, Behavioral Neuroscience and Social Psychology, having authored 25 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (19 papers), Neuroscience of respiration and sleep (9 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (6 papers), Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (6 papers), Stress Responses and Cortisol (5 papers), Regulation of Appetite and Obesity (4 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (3 papers) and Growth Hormone and Insulin-like Growth Factors (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (750 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (230 citations) and Social Psychology (933 citations). Philip M. Bull has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Gareth Leng, Mike Ludwig, Govindan Dayanithi, Nancy Sabatier, Rainer Landgraf, Alison J. Douglas, John A. Russell, Colin H. Brown, Céline Caquineau and Michael Jiang.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.