James C. Nieh
- Insect Science top 0.05%
- Insect and Pesticide Research 106
- Bee Products Chemical Analysis 2
-
- Plant and animal studies 123
- Animal Behavior and Reproduction 6
- Genetics top 0.5%
- Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior 120
- Developmental Biology top 2%
- Plant Science top 5%
- Plant Parasitism and Resistance 7
-
- Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research 6
-
- Healthcare and Venom Research 2
- Co-authors
- Simone TosiKen TanShihao DongFelipe Andrés León ContreraDavid W. RoubikEben GoodaleVera Lúcia Imperatriz-FonsecaGiovanni Burgio
- Journals
- Science (1 paper)SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología (1 paper)PLoS ONE (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesChinaBrazil
In The Last Decade
James C. Nieh
125 papers receiving 4.0k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 112
- Insect Science 3.0k
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 3.4k
- Genetics 2.8k
- Developmental Biology 129
- Plant Science 460
Countries citing papers authored by James C. Nieh
This map shows the geographic impact of James C. Nieh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James C. Nieh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James C. Nieh more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James C. Nieh
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James C. Nieh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James C. Nieh. The network helps show where James C. Nieh may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside James C. Nieh, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2024 | 5 | |
| 4 | 2023 | 9 | |
| 5 | 2023 | 3 | |
| 6 | 2023 | 6 | |
| 7 | 2023 | 15 | |
| 8 | 2021 | 5 | |
| 9 | 2021 | 55 | |
| 10 | 2021 | 9 | |
| 11 | 2021 | 7 | |
| 12 | 2020 | 19 | |
| 13 | 2019 | 121 | |
| 14 | 2019 | 81 | |
| 15 | 2017 | 159 | |
| 16 | 2017 | 89 | |
| 17 | 2017 | 180 | |
| 18 | 2014 | 17 | |
| 19 | 2010 | 0 | |
| 20 | 2010 | 96 |
About James C. Nieh
James C. Nieh is a scholar working on Insect Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Genetics, having authored 129 papers that have together received 4.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant and animal studies (123 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (120 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (106 papers), Plant Parasitism and Resistance (7 papers), Animal Behavior and Reproduction (6 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (6 papers), Healthcare and Venom Research (2 papers) and Bee Products Chemical Analysis (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (3.0k citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (3.4k citations) and Genetics (2.8k citations). James C. Nieh has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include Simone Tosi, Ken Tan, Shihao Dong, Felipe Andrés León Contrera, David W. Roubik, Eben Goodale, Vera Lúcia Imperatriz-Fonseca, Giovanni Burgio, Graeme D. Ruxton and Robert D. Magrath. Their work appears in journals such as Science, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.