Felicity Muth

1.7k total citations
40 papers, 939 citations indexed

About

Felicity Muth is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Insect Science and Genetics. According to data from OpenAlex, Felicity Muth has authored 40 papers receiving a total of 939 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 39 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, 29 papers in Insect Science and 24 papers in Genetics. Recurrent topics in Felicity Muth's work include Plant and animal studies (34 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (29 papers) and Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (24 papers). Felicity Muth is often cited by papers focused on Plant and animal studies (34 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (29 papers) and Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (24 papers). Felicity Muth collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Italy. Felicity Muth's co-authors include Anne S. Leonard, Harry Siviter, Susan D. Healy, Daniel R. Papaj, Jacob S. Francis, Rene F. Bonilla, Anna Dornhaus, Ida E. Bailey, Kate V. Morgan and Simone Meddle and has published in prestigious journals such as Trends in Ecology & Evolution, Ecology and The Science of The Total Environment.

In The Last Decade

Felicity Muth

37 papers receiving 933 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Felicity Muth United States	19	781	579	430	188	134	40	939
Carita Lindstedt Finland	19	908 1.2×	335 0.6×	483 1.1×	97 0.5×	221 1.6×	37	1.2k
Johanna Rönn Sweden	16	769 1.0×	423 0.7×	601 1.4×	67 0.4×	249 1.9×	22	1.1k
Harry Siviter United Kingdom	15	723 0.9×	785 1.4×	531 1.2×	128 0.7×	47 0.4×	21	997
Henry S. Pollock United States	15	704 0.9×	564 1.0×	488 1.1×	72 0.4×	313 2.3×	41	1.1k
Rosalyn Gloag Australia	21	869 1.1×	574 1.0×	617 1.4×	91 0.5×	360 2.7×	66	1.1k
David Baracchi Italy	22	624 0.8×	651 1.1×	688 1.6×	113 0.6×	33 0.2×	58	1.1k
Jean‐Sébastien Pierre France	17	287 0.4×	410 0.7×	99 0.2×	232 1.2×	86 0.6×	32	615
Zjef Pereboom Belgium	14	475 0.6×	326 0.6×	439 1.0×	48 0.3×	81 0.6×	26	671
Caspar Schöning Germany	18	685 0.9×	288 0.5×	541 1.3×	51 0.3×	52 0.4×	28	910
John F. Barthell United States	15	578 0.7×	416 0.7×	276 0.6×	223 1.2×	27 0.2×	39	649

Countries citing papers authored by Felicity Muth

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Felicity Muth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Felicity Muth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Felicity Muth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Felicity Muth

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Felicity Muth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Felicity Muth. The network helps show where Felicity Muth may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Felicity Muth

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Felicity Muth. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Felicity Muth based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Felicity Muth. Felicity Muth is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Muth, Felicity, et al.. (2025). Bumblebees as a powerful model for studying cognitive ecology. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 30(2). 104–106.

Siviter, Harry, et al.. (2024). A novel pesticide has lethal consequences for an important pollinator. The Science of The Total Environment. 952. 175935–175935. 5 indexed citations

Muth, Felicity, et al.. (2024). Economic foraging in a floral marketplace: asymmetrically dominated decoy effects in bumblebees. Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences. 291(2031). 20240843–20240843.

Siviter, Harry, et al.. (2024). Field‐realistic exposure to the novel insecticide flupyradifurone reduces reproductive output in a bumblebee (Bombus impatiens). Journal of Applied Ecology. 61(8). 1932–1943. 7 indexed citations

Leonard, Anne S., et al.. (2024). Pollinator cognition and the function of complex rewards. Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 39(11). 1047–1058. 8 indexed citations

Baert, Nicolas, et al.. (2024). Field agrochemical exposure impacts locomotor activity in wild bumblebees. Ecology. 105(6). 5 indexed citations

Fisher, Adrian, May R. Berenbaum, James C. Nieh, et al.. (2023). Breaking the cycle: Reforming pesticide regulation to protect pollinators. BioScience. 73(11). 808–813. 15 indexed citations

Muth, Felicity, et al.. (2023). Octopamine affects gustatory responsiveness and may enhance learning in bumble bees. Apidologie. 54(1). 4 indexed citations

Siviter, Harry, et al.. (2023). Pesticide licensing in the EU and protecting pollinators. Current Biology. 33(2). R44–R48. 20 indexed citations

10.

Muth, Felicity, Casey S. Philbin, Christopher S. Jeffrey, & Anne S. Leonard. (2022). Discovery of octopamine and tyramine in nectar and their effects on bumblebee behavior. iScience. 25(8). 104765–104765. 19 indexed citations

11.

Siviter, Harry & Felicity Muth. (2022). Exposure to the novel insecticide flupyradifurone impairs bumblebee feeding motivation, learning, and memory retention. Environmental Pollution. 307. 119575–119575. 19 indexed citations

12.

Siviter, Harry, Gabriella L. Pardee, Nicolas Baert, et al.. (2022). Wild bees are exposed to low levels of pesticides in urban grasslands and community gardens. The Science of The Total Environment. 858(Pt 2). 159839–159839. 20 indexed citations

13.

Siviter, Harry, et al.. (2021). Bumblebees Exposed to a Neonicotinoid Pesticide Make Suboptimal Foraging Decisions. Environmental Entomology. 50(6). 1299–1303. 19 indexed citations

14.

Muth, Felicity, et al.. (2021). Measuring foraging preferences in bumble bees: a comparison of popular laboratory methods and a test for sucrose preferences following neonicotinoid exposure. Oecologia. 196(4). 963–976. 7 indexed citations

15.

Muth, Felicity & Anne S. Leonard. (2019). A neonicotinoid pesticide impairs foraging, but not learning, in free-flying bumblebees. Scientific Reports. 9(1). 4764–4764. 75 indexed citations

16.

Muth, Felicity, Jacob S. Francis, & Anne S. Leonard. (2016). Bees use the taste of pollen to determine which flowers to visit. Biology Letters. 12(7). 46 indexed citations

17.

Francis, Jacob S., Felicity Muth, Daniel R. Papaj, & Anne S. Leonard. (2016). Nutritional complexity and the structure of bee foraging bouts. Behavioral Ecology. 27(3). 903–911. 16 indexed citations

18.

Muth, Felicity, Daniel R. Papaj, & Anne S. Leonard. (2015). Bees remember flowers for more than one reason: pollen mediates associative learning. Animal Behaviour. 111. 93–100. 70 indexed citations

19.

Muth, Felicity, et al.. (2015). The effects of acute stress on learning and memory in bumblebees. Learning and Motivation. 50. 39–47. 7 indexed citations

20.

Muth, Felicity, et al.. (2013). Colour preferences in nest-building zebra finches. Behavioural Processes. 99. 106–111. 18 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact