James C. Kirsch

430 citations
34 papers · 283 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

James C. Kirsch

28 papers receiving 258 citations

Peers

James C. Kirsch
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
  • Media Technology 179
  • Acoustics and Ultrasonics 4
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 136
  • Ceramics and Composites 24
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 51
Replace Chris Slinger with:
Chris Slinger United Kingdom
Sergey B. Odinokov Russia
R. V. Pole United States
Mark O. Freeman United States
Masahiro Oikawa Japan
Alejandro Jiménez‐Sáez Germany
Kenji Nakazawa Japan
Young-Tae Lim South Korea
Malcolm McCormick United Kingdom
Boaz Jessie Jackin Japan
James C. Kirsch relative to Chris Slinger United Kingdom Chris Slinger's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Chris Slinger · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James C. Kirsch

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James C. Kirsch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James C. Kirsch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James C. Kirsch more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James C. Kirsch

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James C. Kirsch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James C. Kirsch. The network helps show where James C. Kirsch may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside James C. Kirsch, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James C. Kirsch Line = papers co-authored together James C. Kirsch links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199267
2 199256
3 199129
4 200525
5 199121
6 198814
7 200512
8 20086
9 19896
10 19995
11 19875
12 20034
13 19893
14 19673
15 19903
16 19922
17 20052
18 19882
19 20002
20 19932

About James C. Kirsch

James C. Kirsch is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Media Technology, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Biomedical Engineering and Instrumentation, having authored 34 papers that have together received 283 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Optical Imaging Technologies (15 papers), Semiconductor Lasers and Optical Devices (13 papers), Photonic and Optical Devices (12 papers), Photorefractive and Nonlinear Optics (5 papers), Advanced Optical Sensing Technologies (4 papers), Liquid Crystal Research Advancements (4 papers), Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts (3 papers) and Optical Systems and Laser Technology (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Media Technology (179 citations), Acoustics and Ultrasonics (4 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (136 citations), Ceramics and Composites (24 citations) and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (51 citations). James C. Kirsch has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Don A. Gregory, Suganda Jutamulia, Tracy D. Hudson, William Lindberg, Francis T. S. Yu, T. Hartnett, Lee M. Goldman, John L. Johnson, Brian K. Jones and Daniel C. Harris. Their work appears in journals such as Optical Engineering, Microwave and Optical Technology Letters, The American Journal of Psychology, Psychological Perspectives and Applied Optics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact