James C. Ingram

604 citations
20 papers · 357 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

James C. Ingram

18 papers receiving 278 citations

Peers

James C. Ingram
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 87
  • Finance 87
  • Emergency Medicine 82
  • Economics and Econometrics 84
  • Surgery 128
Replace Andrea Stella with:
Andrea Stella Italy
Ioannis Halikias United States
Jonathan P. Goldstein United States
Cameron McLoughlin United States
Anga R. Timilsina United States
Zeynep Karaçor Türkiye
James E. Dougherty United States
Giovanni Verga Italy
F. Carlos Mexico
Alfredo Cuevas United States
James C. Ingram relative to Andrea Stella Italy Andrea Stella's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×20.5×
Andrea Stella · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James C. Ingram

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James C. Ingram's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James C. Ingram with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James C. Ingram more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James C. Ingram

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James C. Ingram. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James C. Ingram. The network helps show where James C. Ingram may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside James C. Ingram, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James C. Ingram Line = papers co-authored together James C. Ingram links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 1974142
2
The case for European monetary integration
197356
3 195935
4 195533
5 195632
6 197520
7 19797
8 19564
9 19604
10 19544
11 19614
12 19583
13 19783
14
International Economic Problems
19703
15 19752
16 19562
17 19571
18 19601
19 19791
20 19740

About James C. Ingram

James C. Ingram is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Finance, Anthropology, General Economics, Econometrics and Finance and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 20 papers that have together received 357 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies (4 papers), Global Financial Crisis and Policies (4 papers), Monetary Policy and Economic Impact (2 papers), Political Theory and Influence (2 papers), Abdominal Trauma and Injuries (1 paper), Local Government Finance and Decentralization (1 paper), Hernia repair and management (1 paper) and Trauma Management and Diagnosis (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (87 citations), Finance (87 citations), Emergency Medicine (82 citations), Economics and Econometrics (84 citations) and Surgery (128 citations). James C. Ingram has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Francis C. Nance, Lester W. Johnson, Isidore Cohn, Charles F. Keyes, Simon Kuznets, Joseph J. Spengler, Wilbert E. Moore, Arthur I. Bloomfield, Wilhelm Röpke and F. Benham. Their work appears in journals such as The Quarterly Journal of Economics, History of Political Economy, Annals of Surgery, Pacific Affairs and The Economic History Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact