James C. Becker

26 papers receiving 502 citations

Peers

James C. Becker
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • Mathematical Physics 231
  • Algebra and Number Theory 114
  • Geometry and Topology 215
  • Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics 20
  • Surgery 217
Replace Huijun Fan with:
Huijun Fan China
Kevin Houston United Kingdom
David A. Weinberg United States
Hoang Ngoc Minh France
Katsumi Yagi Japan
Matthew Greenberg Canada
Alessandro D’Andrea Italy
Makoto Sakuma Japan
Enrique Ramírez de Arellano Mexico
Thomas Breuer Germany
James C. Becker relative to Huijun Fan China Huijun Fan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.3×
Huijun Fan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James C. Becker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James C. Becker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James C. Becker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James C. Becker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James C. Becker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James C. Becker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James C. Becker. The network helps show where James C. Becker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James C. Becker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James C. Becker Line = papers co-authored together James C. Becker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1975114
2 201696
3 201952
4
Transfer maps for fibrations and duality
197651
5 201741
6 201835
7 201730
8 197430
9 197728
10 196815
11 196812
12 199811
13 199111
14 19829
15 20208
16 19708
17 20208
18 19708
19 20206
20 20176

About James C. Becker

James C. Becker is a scholar working on Geometry and Topology, Mathematical Physics, Surgery, Algebra and Number Theory and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 28 papers that have together received 594 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology (10 papers), Advanced Topics in Algebra (10 papers), Congenital Anomalies and Fetal Surgery (6 papers), Spinal Dysraphism and Malformations (5 papers), Mathematics and Applications (4 papers), Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Studies (4 papers), Advanced Differential Geometry Research (2 papers) and Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Mathematical Physics (231 citations), Algebra and Number Theory (114 citations), Geometry and Topology (215 citations), Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics (20 citations) and Surgery (217 citations). James C. Becker has collaborated with scholars based in United States and China. Frequent co-authors include Daniel Henry Gottlieb, Reinhard Schultz, B Keller, Sandra Kabagambe, Julia Chen, Diana L. Farmer, Laura F. Goodman, Aijun Wang, Lee Lankford and Priyadarsini Kumar. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Pediatric Surgery, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy, Topology and Compositio Mathematica.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact