This map shows the geographic impact of James Bray's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Bray with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Bray more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Bray. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Bray. The network helps show where James Bray may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 2 scholars most cited alongside James Bray, linked wherever they
have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers
they share.
Border = papers with James BrayLine = papers co-authored togetherJames Bray links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.
James Bray is a scholar working on Mechanics of Materials, Geophysics, Mechanical Engineering, Infectious Diseases and Organic Chemistry, having authored 2 papers that have together received 438 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis (1 paper), Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques (1 paper) and Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (46 citations), Social Psychology (71 citations), Statistics and Probability (26 citations), Applied Psychology (15 citations) and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (30 citations). James Bray has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Scott E. Maxwell and William Grieser.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.