James Ash

34 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Hit Papers

Digital turn, digital geographies? 2016 · 472 citations
4720+4+8Years since publication100200300400

Peers

James Ash
Comparison fields: 5 of 111
  • Geography, Planning and Development 572
  • Human-Computer Interaction 154
  • Urban Studies 135
  • Museology 66
  • Transportation 125
Replace Noortje Marres with:
Noortje Marres United Kingdom
Shanti Sumartojo Australia
Agnieszka Leszczynski Canada
Adriana de Souza e Silva United States
David Bissell Australia
Heather A. Horst Australia
André Jansson Sweden
Kevin Hetherington United Kingdom
Paul Virilio France
Celia Lury United Kingdom
James Ash relative to Noortje Marres United Kingdom Noortje Marres's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Noortje Marres · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James Ash

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Ash's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Ash with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Ash more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Ash

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Ash. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Ash. The network helps show where James Ash may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside James Ash, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James Ash Line = papers co-authored together James Ash links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 39 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Digital turn, digital geographies?
Hit paper breakdown →
2016472
2
Geography and post-phenomenology
Hit paper breakdown →
2014141
3 2013108
4 201281
5 201873
6 202071
7 201071
8 201364
9 200957
10 201457
11 201747
12 201141
13 202038
14 201237
15 201935
16 201032
17 201931
18 201730
19 201828
20 201926

About James Ash

James Ash is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Geography, Planning and Development, Human-Computer Interaction, Cultural Studies and Computer Science Applications, having authored 39 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Digital Games and Media (11 papers), Geographies of human-animal interactions (11 papers), Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (10 papers), Posthumanist Ethics and Activism (7 papers), Digital Media and Philosophy (6 papers), Cinema and Media Studies (3 papers), Geographic Information Systems Studies (3 papers) and Cultural Industries and Urban Development (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geography, Planning and Development (572 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (154 citations), Urban Studies (135 citations), Museology (66 citations) and Transportation (125 citations). James Ash has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Agnieszka Leszczynski, Rob Kitchin, Paul Simpson, Rachel Gordon, Ben Anderson, Paul Langley, Lesley Gallacher, Alexandra Sexton, Mara Miele and Allison Hayes‐Conroy. Their work appears in journals such as Dialogues in Human Geography, Geoforum, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, Cultural Geographies and Environment and Planning A Economy and Space.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact