James A. G. Jackman
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 10%
- Instrumentation top 10%
- Computational Mechanics
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
- Aerospace Engineering
- Co-authors
- Evgenya L. ShkolnikR. O. Parke LoydAdam C. SchneiderTravis BarmanSuzanne L. HawleyJames R. A. DavenportEric AgolVictoria Meadows
- Topics
- Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (14 papers)Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (7 papers)Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies (7 papers)
- Journals
- The Astrophysical JournalMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical SocietyThe Astronomical Journal
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomChile
In The Last Decade
James A. G. Jackman
13 papers receiving 133 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 22
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 168
- Instrumentation 64
- Computational Mechanics 9
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 8
- Aerospace Engineering 7
Countries citing papers authored by James A. G. Jackman
This map shows the geographic impact of James A. G. Jackman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James A. G. Jackman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James A. G. Jackman more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James A. G. Jackman
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James A. G. Jackman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James A. G. Jackman. The network helps show where James A. G. Jackman may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of James A. G. Jackman
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James A. G. Jackman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James A. G. Jackman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James A. G. Jackman. James A. G. Jackman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 11 | |
| 4 | 11 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 26 | |
| 7 | 26 | |
| 8 | 4 | |
| 9 | 12 | |
| 10 | 21 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 16 | |
| 13 | 28 | |
| 14 | 10 |
About James A. G. Jackman
James A. G. Jackman is a scholar working on Instrumentation, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Global and Planetary Change, having authored 14 papers that have together received 174 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (14 papers), Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (7 papers) and Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Instrumentation (64 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (168 citations) and Computational Mechanics (9 citations). James A. G. Jackman has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Chile. Frequent co-authors include Evgenya L. Shkolnik, R. O. Parke Loyd, Adam C. Schneider, Travis Barman, Suzanne L. Hawley, James R. A. Davenport, Eric Agol, Victoria Meadows, Scott W. Fleming and Sarah Peacock. Their work appears in journals such as The Astrophysical Journal, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society and The Astronomical Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.