Jake Cosme

629 total citations
9 papers, 209 citations indexed

About

Jake Cosme is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Surgery and Oncology. According to data from OpenAlex, Jake Cosme has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 209 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Molecular Biology, 3 papers in Surgery and 3 papers in Oncology. Recurrent topics in Jake Cosme's work include Extracellular vesicles in disease (4 papers), Peptidase Inhibition and Analysis (3 papers) and Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications (2 papers). Jake Cosme is often cited by papers focused on Extracellular vesicles in disease (4 papers), Peptidase Inhibition and Analysis (3 papers) and Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications (2 papers). Jake Cosme collaborates with scholars based in Canada, United States and United Kingdom. Jake Cosme's co-authors include Anthony O. Gramolini, Parveen Sharma, Andrew Emili, Hongbo Guo, Peter P. Liu, Uroš Kuzmanov, Ruth Isserlin, Paul S. F. Yip, David Daghfal and Jennifer Taher and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Nature Communications and Journal of Proteome Research.

In The Last Decade

Jake Cosme

9 papers receiving 204 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Jake Cosme Canada	7	133	62	41	33	19	9	209
Jianqiu Pei China	9	196 1.5×	103 1.7×	95 2.3×	59 1.8×	24 1.3×	20	316
Tricia T Nguyen United States	5	146 1.1×	72 1.2×	75 1.8×	57 1.7×	34 1.8×	5	318
Shichao Pang China	7	81 0.6×	26 0.4×	28 0.7×	20 0.6×	8 0.4×	15	165
Janise Lalic Singapore	5	229 1.7×	109 1.8×	13 0.3×	136 4.1×	28 1.5×	5	309
Philyoung Lee United States	8	325 2.4×	141 2.3×	100 2.4×	64 1.9×	14 0.7×	8	416
Nilay Mitash United States	11	142 1.1×	14 0.2×	81 2.0×	62 1.9×	14 0.7×	19	257
Dalia Elfadl United Kingdom	6	62 0.5×	50 0.8×	23 0.6×	126 3.8×	17 0.9×	7	216
Cuixia Chu United States	7	76 0.6×	141 2.3×	21 0.5×	49 1.5×	15 0.8×	7	218
Ivan Menendez-Montes United States	7	138 1.0×	79 1.3×	28 0.7×	44 1.3×	25 1.3×	15	204
Rosario Abellán Spain	12	80 0.6×	12 0.2×	35 0.9×	51 1.5×	23 1.2×	19	270

Countries citing papers authored by Jake Cosme

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jake Cosme's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jake Cosme with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jake Cosme more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jake Cosme

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jake Cosme. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jake Cosme. The network helps show where Jake Cosme may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jake Cosme

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jake Cosme. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jake Cosme based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jake Cosme. Jake Cosme is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

1.

Fung, Angela W.S., et al.. (2022). Vitamin D Toxicity from an Unusual and Unexpected Source: A Report of 2 Cases. Hormone Research in Paediatrics. 96(3). 332–340. 6 indexed citations

2.

Miyake, Tetsuaki, Allen C. T. Teng, Jake Cosme, et al.. (2020). REEP5 depletion causes sarco-endoplasmic reticulum vacuolization and cardiac functional defects. Nature Communications. 11(1). 965–965. 29 indexed citations

3.

Taher, Jennifer, et al.. (2018). A novel Sigma metric encompasses global multi-site performance of 18 assays on the Abbott Alinity system. Clinical Biochemistry. 63. 106–112. 16 indexed citations

4.

Cosme, Jake, et al.. (2017). Hypoxia-Induced Changes in the Fibroblast Secretome, Exosome, and Whole-Cell Proteome Using Cultured, Cardiac-Derived Cells Isolated from Neonatal Mice. Journal of Proteome Research. 16(8). 2836–2847. 54 indexed citations

5.

Kuzmanov, Uroš, Hongbo Guo, Jake Cosme, et al.. (2016). Global phosphoproteomic profiling reveals perturbed signaling in a mouse model of dilated cardiomyopathy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 113(44). 12592–12597. 33 indexed citations

6.

Cosme, Jake, Peter P. Liu, & Anthony O. Gramolini. (2013). The cardiovascular exosome: Current perspectives and potential. PROTEOMICS. 13(10-11). 1654–1659. 39 indexed citations

7.

Cosme, Jake, Andrew Emili, & Anthony O. Gramolini. (2013). Large-Scale Characterization of the Murine Cardiac Proteome. Methods in molecular biology. 1005. 1–10. 3 indexed citations

8.

Sharma, Parveen, Jake Cosme, & Anthony O. Gramolini. (2012). Recent advances in cardiovascular proteomics. Journal of Proteomics. 81. 3–14. 28 indexed citations

9.

Cosme, Jake, et al.. (2012). 365 Proteomic Characterization of the Cardiac Fibroblast Exosome. Canadian Journal of Cardiology. 28(5). S234–S234. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact