Nathan S. Consedine

172 papers receiving 5.0k citations

Peers

Nathan S. Consedine
Comparison fields: 5 of 160
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 245
  • Applied Psychology 519
  • Clinical Psychology 1.6k
  • Social Psychology 1.4k
  • Health 531
Replace Carol Magai with:
Carol Magai United States
Howard Leventhal United States
Boaz Kahana United States
Benjamin P. Chapman United States
Nina Knoll Germany
Sarah J. Shema United States
Vanessa L. Malcarne United States
Ehud Bodner Israel
Markus Zenger Germany
Ian Brissette United States
Nathan S. Consedine relative to Carol Magai United States Carol Magai's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.1×
Carol Magai · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nathan S. Consedine

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nathan S. Consedine's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nathan S. Consedine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nathan S. Consedine more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nathan S. Consedine

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nathan S. Consedine. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nathan S. Consedine. The network helps show where Nathan S. Consedine may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nathan S. Consedine, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nathan S. Consedine Line = papers co-authored together Nathan S. Consedine links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 179 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004309
2 2016174
3 2002137
4 2007128
5 2014121
6 2003116
7 2005114
8 2008107
9 2006106
10 200998
11 200692
12 202086
13 200381
14 200480
15 200280
16 200678
17 201878
18 201477
19 200772
20 200271

About Nathan S. Consedine

Nathan S. Consedine is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology, General Health Professions, Psychiatry and Mental health and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 179 papers that have together received 5.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions (34 papers), Empathy and Medical Education (25 papers), Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (19 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (18 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (18 papers), Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (16 papers), COVID-19 and Mental Health (15 papers) and Eating Disorders and Behaviors (14 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (245 citations), Applied Psychology (519 citations), Clinical Psychology (1.6k citations), Social Psychology (1.4k citations) and Health (531 citations). Nathan S. Consedine has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Carol Magai, Alfred I. Neugut, Antonio Fernando, William M. Brown, Katherine L. Fiori, Eva‐Maria Merz, Lisa Reynolds, Judith T. Moskowitz, Anna M. Friis and Richard Cutfield. Their work appears in journals such as Mindfulness, British Journal of Health Psychology, Journal of Psychosomatic Research, Annals of Behavioral Medicine and Attachment & Human Development.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact