Jacqueline Counotte
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 10%
- Clinical Psychology
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 10%
- Human-Computer Interaction top 5%
- Social Psychology
- Co-authors
- Wim VelingRoos Pot-KolderMark van der GaagJim van OsHemmo A. DrexhageHans W. HoekVeerle BerginkChris Geraets
- Topics
- Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (6 papers)Schizophrenia research and treatment (5 papers)Mental Health Research Topics (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Jacqueline Counotte
14 papers receiving 357 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
- Psychiatry and Mental health 154
- Clinical Psychology 85
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 82
- Human-Computer Interaction 65
- Social Psychology 52
Countries citing papers authored by Jacqueline Counotte
This map shows the geographic impact of Jacqueline Counotte's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jacqueline Counotte with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jacqueline Counotte more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jacqueline Counotte
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jacqueline Counotte. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jacqueline Counotte. The network helps show where Jacqueline Counotte may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jacqueline Counotte
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jacqueline Counotte. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jacqueline Counotte based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jacqueline Counotte. Jacqueline Counotte is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 12 | |
| 2 | 28 | |
| 3 | 17 | |
| 4 | 49 | |
| 5 | 20 | |
| 6 | 18 | |
| 7 | 30 | |
| 8 | 103 | |
| 9 | 39 | |
| 10 | 18 | |
| 11 | VIRTUAL REALITY EXPERIMENTS LINKING SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT, STRESS SENSITIZATION AND PSYCHOSIS | 1 |
| 12 | 15 | |
| 13 | 2 | |
| 14 | 12 |
About Jacqueline Counotte
Jacqueline Counotte is a scholar working on Biological Psychiatry, Behavioral Neuroscience and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 14 papers that have together received 364 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (6 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (5 papers) and Mental Health Research Topics (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (51 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (46 citations) and Human-Computer Interaction (65 citations). Jacqueline Counotte has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Wim Veling, Roos Pot-Kolder, Mark van der Gaag, Jim van Os, Hemmo A. Drexhage, Hans W. Hoek, Veerle Bergink, Chris Geraets, Marije van Beilen and Elfi Vergaelen. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Psychological Medicine and European Journal of Immunology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.